Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35567720›Full record

ReviewPain and therapy2022

A Systematic Review of the Variation in Pain Catastrophizing Scale Reference Scores Based on Language Version and Country in Patients with Chronic Primary (Non-specific) Pain.

Kazuhiro Hayashi, Tatsunori Ikemoto, Yukiko Shiro, Young-Chang Arai, Anna Marcuzzi, Daniel Costa, Paul J Wrigley

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Kazuhiro HayashiDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Tatsunori IkemotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Yazako Karimata, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan. tatsunon31-ik@umin.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4521-7639
Yukiko ShiroMultidisciplinary Pain Center, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan.
Young-Chang AraiMultidisciplinary Pain Center, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan.
Anna MarcuzziThe University of Sydney, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Daniel CostaThe University of Sydney, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Paul J WrigleyThe University of Sydney, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Aichi Medical University · JPThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis systematic review aimed to investigate variations of reference scores for the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) between language versions and between countries in patients with chronic primary pain (CPP) or chronic primary pain, not otherwise specified (CPP-NOS).

methodsElectronic searches of the Ovid/Embase, Ovid/MEDLINE, and Ovid/PsycINFO databases were conducted to retrieve studies assessing PCS scores in adults with CPP or CPP-NOS proposed by the International Classification of Diseases, Eleventh Revision for any country where the translated PCS was available. The protocol for this systematic review was prospectively registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews 2018 (registration number: CRD 42018086719).

resultsA total of 3634 articles were screened after removal of duplicates. From these, 241 articles reporting on 32,282 patients with chronic pain were included in the review. The mean (± standard deviation) weighted PCS score across all articles was 25.04 ± 12.87. Of the 12 language versions and 21 countries included in the review, the weighted mean PCS score in Asian languages or Asian countries was significantly higher than that in English, European, and other languages or Western and other countries. The highest mean score of the weighted PCS based on language was in Japanese (mean 33.55), and the lowest was in Russian (mean 20.32). The highest mean score of the weighted PCS based on country was from Japan (mean 33.55), and the lowest was from Australia (mean 19.80).

conclusionThe weighted PCS scores for people with CPP or CPP-NOS were significantly higher in Asian language versions/Asian countries than in English, European and other language versions or Western and other countries.

Indexed as

CatastrophizationChronic primary painCultureLanguageSystematic reviews

Identifiers

PMID35567720
PMCPMC9314526
OpenAlexW4280501997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.