ArticleInfectious diseases and therapy2022
Real-World, Multicenter Case Series of Patients Treated with Oral Omadacycline for Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens.
Article in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of omadacycline for treating complicated skin and soft tissue infections: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Combined effect of eravacycline and omadacycline with other antimicrobial agents against Acinetobacter Baumannii.The Journal of antibiotics · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Tetracyclines in Bone and Joint Infections: A Literature Review.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Review
- Multicenter Real-World Outpatient Use of Intravenous Omadacycline.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Omadacycline in Critically Ill Patients Treated for Carbapenem-Resistant Organism Infections: A Retrospective Study.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Comparative in vitro Activity and Clinical Outcomes of Eravacycline, Tigecycline, and Omadacycline Against Carbapenem-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Evaluation of omadacyclineAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Omadacycline Versus Tigecycline in Treating Severe Pneumonia Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Article
- Clinical Features and Treatment Differences Among Tuberculous, Brucellosis, and Pyogenic Spondylitis: A Cohort Study.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Article
- A matched pilot cohort study of intravenous omadacycline in the treatment of severe pneumonia associated with carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Omadacycline for Diverse Infections in China: A Real-World Analysis of Efficacy and Safety.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2024Article
- Possible omadacycline induce acute pancreatitis: a case report and literature review.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Review
- Combinations of Antibiotics Effective against Extensively- and Pandrug-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Sulbactam-durlobactam: a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination targetingFuture microbiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAntibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria have been associated with substantial morbidity and mortality and have limited treatment options available. Omadacycline (OMC) is an aminomethylcycline antibiotic that has been shown to exhibit broad in vitro activity against antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Given the lack of real-world data, the primary objective of our report was to describe early experience with OMC for the treatment of resistant Gram-negative infections.
methodsThis was a real-world, multicenter, observational cases series/pilot study conducted in the USA. Inclusion criteria included any adult patient aged ≥ 18 years who received OMC for ≥ 72 h either in the inpatient and/or outpatient setting. Clinical success was defined as a composite of 90-day survival from initiation of OMC, lack of alteration in treatment/addition of other antibiotic due to concerns of OMC failure, and lack of microbiologic recurrence within 30 days from the end of therapy.
resultsOral OMC was used in nine cases primarily for multidrug-resistant (MDR)/extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections (55.6% XDR and/or carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii [CRAB]). The majority of infections were of bone/joint (55.6%) origin, followed by intra-abdominal (33.3%) origin. Clinical success occurred in 66.7% of cases, with 80.0% success each in infections of bone/joint origin or those caused by CRAB. One patient experienced an adverse effect that was not treatment limiting while on therapy (gastrointestinal).
conclusionThe use of oral OMC in MDR/XDR Gram-negative infections exhibited a relatively high success rate with minimal adverse effects. Real-world studies with larger case numbers are needed to confirm our initial findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.