ReviewJournal of ultrasound2023
A concise guide to transtemporal contrast-enhanced ultrasound in children.
Review in Journal of ultrasound, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microvascular Ultrasound Imaging in the Neonatal Brain: From Advanced Doppler to Super-Resolution.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025Review
- Advanced Neuromonitoring Modalities on the Horizon: Detection and Management of Acute Brain Injury in Children.Neurocritical care · 2023Review
- Transtemporal brain contrast-enhanced ultrasound in children: preliminary experience in patients without neurological disorders.Journal of ultrasound · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Brain contrast-enhanced ultrasound offers insights into the brain beyond the anatomic information offered by conventional grayscale ultrasound. In infants, the open fontanelles serve as acoustic windows. In children, whose fontanelles are closed, the temporal bone serves as the ideal acoustic window due to its relatively smaller thickness than the other skull bones. Diagnosis of common neurologic diseases such as stroke, hemorrhage, and hydrocephalus has been performed using the technique. Transtemporal ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound, however, are rarely used in children due to the prevalent notion that the limited acoustic penetrance degrades diagnostic quality. This review seeks to provide guidelines for the use of transtemporal brain contrast-enhanced ultrasound in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.