Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35567674›Full record

SynthesisQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2022

Measurement properties and interpretability of the PROMIS item banks in stroke patients: a systematic review.

Daniëlla M Oosterveer, Henk Arwert, Caroline B Terwee, Jan W Schoones, Thea P M Vliet Vlieland

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Psychometric properties and general population reference values for PROMIS Global Health in Hungary.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniëlla M OosterveerBasalt Rehabilitation, Wassenaarseweg 501, 2333 AL, Leiden, The Netherlands. d.oosterveer@basaltrevalidatie.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1540-6903
Henk ArwertBasalt Rehabilitation, Wassenaarseweg 501, 2333 AL, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Caroline B TerweeEpidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Center Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan W SchoonesDirectorate of Research Policy (Formerly: Walaeus Library), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Thea P M Vliet VlielandBasalt Rehabilitation, Wassenaarseweg 501, 2333 AL, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBoth the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement and the National Institutes of Health recommend the use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) measures in clinical care and research for stroke patients. This study aimed to systematically review the literature on the measurement properties and interpretability of PROMIS measures in stroke patients.

methodsNine databases were searched from January 1st, 2007 till April 12th, 2021 for studies concerning the measurement properties and interpretability of PROMIS measures in stroke patients. The findings of these studies were analyzed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs).

resultsTen studies were included. The PROMIS Global Health was studied the most: its two subscales had sufficient structural validity in one study of very good quality, sufficient construct validity with > 75% of hypotheses tested confirmed (high GRADE rating), sufficient internal consistency, i.e. α ≥ 0.70 in two studies (high GRADE rating), sufficient reliability, i.e. ICC ≥ 0.70 in one study of doubtful quality, and indeterminate responsiveness in one study of inadequate quality. For other PROMIS measures, the measurement properties and interpretability were limitedly studied.

conclusionThe PROMIS Global Health showed sufficient structural and construct validity and internal consistency in stroke patients. There is a need for further research on content validity, structural validity, and measurement invariance of PROMIS measures in stroke patients. Trial Registration Information: CRD42020203044 (PROSPERO).

Indexed as

Quality of LifeStrokeHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresReproducibility of ResultsInterpretabilityMeasurement propertiesPatient-reported outcome measuresPROMISPsychometricsReviewStroke

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.