Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35567672›Full record

ReviewTargeted oncology2022

Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Uro-Oncology.

Dawid Sigorski, Paweł Różanowski, Ewa Iżycka-Świeszewska, Katarzyna Wiktorska

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Targeted oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Dawid SigorskiDepartment of Oncology, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland. dawid.sigorski@uwm.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4799-9611
Paweł RóżanowskiDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Immuno-Oncology, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9179-6435
Ewa Iżycka-ŚwieszewskaDepartment of Pathology and Neuropathology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7550-1326
Katarzyna WiktorskaDepartment of Drug Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, National Medicines Institute, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2731-9535
Copernicus Memorial Hospital · PLGreater Poland Cancer Center · PLMinisterio del Interior · ESWarsaw University of Technology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently available treatment options for patients with refractory metastatic prostate, bladder, or kidney cancers are limited with the prognosis remaining poor. Advances in the pathobiology of tumors has led to the discovery of cancer antigens that may be used as the target for cancer treatment. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a relatively new concept in cancer treatment that broaden therapeutic landscape. ADCs are examples of a 'drug delivery into the tumor' system composed of an antigen-directed antibody linked to a cytotoxic drug that may release cytotoxic components after binding to the antigen located on the surface of tumor cells. The clinical properties of drugs are influenced by every component of ADCs. Regarding uro-oncology, enfortumab vedotin (EV) and sacituzumab govitecan (SG) are currently registered for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer following previous treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (iCPI; programmed death receptor-1 [PD-1] or programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-L1]) inhibitor) and platinum-containing chemotherapy. The EV-301 trial showed that EV significantly prolonged the overall survival compared with classic chemotherapy. The TROPHY-U-01 trial conducted to evaluate SG demonstrated promising results as regards the objective response rate and duration of response. The safety and efficacy of ADCs in monotherapy and polytherapy (mainly with iCPIs) for different cancer stages and tumor types are assessed in numerous ongoing clinical trials. The aim of this review is to present new molecular biomarkers, specific mechanisms of action, and ongoing clinical trials of ADCs in genitourinary cancers. In the expert discussion, we assess the place of ADCs in uro-oncology and discuss their clinical value.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Transitional CellImmunoconjugatesClinical Trials as TopicHumansMaleAntineoplastic AgentsImmunoconjugates

Identifiers

PMID35567672
OpenAlexW4280542724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.