Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35567230›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Sustainable Intensification of a Rice-Maize System through Conservation Agriculture to Enhance System Productivity in Southern India.

Mangal Deep Tuti, Mahender Kumar Rapolu, Banugu Sreedevi, Nirmala Bandumula, Surekha Kuchi, Sonth Bandeppa, Soumya Saha, Brajendra Parmar, Santosha Rathod, Gabrijel Ondrasek and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mangal Deep TutiICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research, Hyderabad 500030, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5173-718X
Mahender Kumar RapoluICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research, Hyderabad 500030, India.
Banugu SreedeviICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research, Hyderabad 500030, India.
Nirmala BandumulaICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research, Hyderabad 500030, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3710-1676
Surekha KuchiICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research, Hyderabad 500030, India.
Sonth BandeppaICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research, Hyderabad 500030, India.
Soumya SahaICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack 753006, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3647-8351
Brajendra ParmarICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research, Hyderabad 500030, India.
Santosha RathodICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research, Hyderabad 500030, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9820-149X
Gabrijel OndrasekFaculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-8398-0099
Raman Meenakshi SundaramICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research, Hyderabad 500030, India.
Indian Institute of Rice Research · INCentral Rice Research Institute · INUniversity of Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrated management of rice-maize systems is an emerging challenge in southern India due to improper rice residues and tillage management in maize crops. Conservation agriculture (CA) practices such as a reduced tillage and maintaining stubble mulch may hold the potential to increase yields, reduce crop establishment costs and increase farm incomes. A five-year trial was performed to study the effect of different CA and establishment methods in rice on system productivity, profitability, and soil carbon status in a rice-maize system. In the rainy season, the trial consisted of two main treatments: (i) normal manual transplanting and (ii) direct-wet seeding, and three sub-main treatments at different sowing dates with fifteen day intervals. In addition, in the winter season, two tillage treatments (conventional and minimum tillage) were imposed over the rainy season treatments. Both rice and maize were grown under irrigated conditions. The results showed that sowing times at 15 day intervals did not impact the yield significantly. Transplanted rice obtained a significantly higher grain yield during the first four years, but in the last year, the yield was similar in both of the establishment methods. In the winter season, conventional tilled maize recorded a higher cob yield than under the minimum tilled treatment, except for the last year, where both the tillage treatment effects were the same. System productivity of CA-based minimum tilled rice-maize was inferior during the first three years but was superior to the conventionally tilled method in the fourth and fifth year. Pooled analysis revealed that the conventionally tilled rice-maize system resulted in a similar system productivity as that of the CA during the study period. The cost-benefit analysis revealed that transplanted rice and conventionally tilled maize fetched higher net returns of INR 111,074 and INR 101,658/ha, respectively, over the direct-wet seeded rice and CA. In addition, the 15 July rice sown followed by the maize system led to an increase in irrigation water productivity by 15.7%, and the total water (irrigation + rainfall) productivity by 27.1% in the maize crop compared with the 30 July sown system. The CA-based rice-maize system resulted in a significantly higher very labile (0.194%) and labile (0.196%) carbon concentration at a 0-5 cm depth of soil compared to those under the conventional system. Thus, CA can be recommended for southern India and similar agro-ecological tropic and sub-tropic conditions. This system can be followed with appropriate location-specific modification in South-Asian countries, where crop yields and soil health are declining as a result of continuous cereal-cereal crop rotation.

Indexed as

conservation agriculturerice–maize systemsouthern Indiasustainable intensification

Identifiers

PMID35567230
PMCPMC9104208
OpenAlexW4225273890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.