ArticlePolymers2022
The Impact of Selected Laser-Marking Parameters and Surface Conditions on White Polypropylene Moldings.
Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laser marking of polymer materials is a technology that is increasingly used in industry. Polypropylene (PP) shows a low ability to absorb electromagnetic radiation in the near-infrared range (λ = 1064 nm). The paper presents the influence of the surface condition of white-colored polypropylene moldings on the efficiency of their marking with a laser beam. In addition, the operation of the commercial laser marking additive (LMA) Lifolas M 117009 UN, intended to support the process of laser marking of polyolefin surfaces, was verified. The study is an attempt to combine laser operating parameters, material, and geometric properties of PP moldings to obtain the expected quality of graphic symbols. The test samples were made by injection molding method with the use of a specially designed modular injection mold. The molding cavities were prepared with various methods of metal processing, thanks to which obtained moldings differed in surface condition. The marking effects were assessed based on colorimetric tests and digital image analysis. The 0.5 wt% LMA content resulted in obtaining a graphic sign with high contrast in comparison to the background. The gradual increase in the modifier content resulted in a further increase in contrast. These values depended on the degree of surface finish of the samples, and therefore on the roughness parameters. Samples with a rough surface finish showed higher contrast compared to surfaces with a high surface finish. It was also found that for the analyzed moldings, the laser-marking process should be performed with the use of a low head velocity (450-750 mm/s) and a high concentration of the laser beam (0.03-0.05 mm).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.