Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35566886›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Polymer Coating Integrity, Thrombogenicity and Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Provisional Stenting Technique in the Left Main Bifurcation Setting: Insights from an In-Vitro Model.

Marek Milewski, Chen Koon Jaryl Ng, Pawel Gąsior, Shaoliang Shawn Lian, Su Xiao Qian, Shengjie Lu, Nicolas Foin, Elvin Kedhi, Wojciech Wojakowski, Hui Ying Ang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Coatings for Cardiovascular Stents-An Up-to-Date Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  2. DES Selection for Left Main and Coronary Bifurcation Stenting.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Marek MilewskiDivision of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-635 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5459-9125
Chen Koon Jaryl NgNational Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre Singapore, 5 Hospital Drive, Singapore 169609, Singapore.
Pawel GąsiorDivision of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-635 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8564-7257
Shaoliang Shawn LianDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore.
Su Xiao QianDivision of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637459, Singapore.
Shengjie LuNational Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre Singapore, 5 Hospital Drive, Singapore 169609, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-3365-6383
Nicolas FoinNational Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre Singapore, 5 Hospital Drive, Singapore 169609, Singapore.
Elvin KedhiDivision of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-635 Katowice, Poland.
Wojciech WojakowskiDivision of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-635 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3681-5207
Hui Ying AngNational Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre Singapore, 5 Hospital Drive, Singapore 169609, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-6134-5596
Medical University of Silesia · PLNational Heart Centre Singapore · SGNational University of Singapore · SGDuke-NUS Medical School · SGNanyang Technological University · SGUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, the provisional stenting technique is the gold standard in revascularization of lesions located in the left main (LM) bifurcation. The benefit of the routine kissing balloon technique (KBI) in bifurcation lesions is still debated, particularly following the single stent treatment. We compared the latest-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) with no side branch (SB) dilatation "keep it open" technique (KIO) vs. KBI technique vs. bifurcation dedicated drug-eluting stent (BD-DES) implantation. In vitro testing was performed under a static condition in bifurcation silicone vessel models. All the devices were implanted in accordance with the manufacturers' recommendations. As a result, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis demonstrated a statistically higher area of high shear rate in the KIO group when compared to KBI. Likewise, the maximal shear rate was higher in number in the KIO group. Floating strut count based on the OCT imaging was significantly higher in KIO than in KBI and BD-DES. Furthermore, according to OTC analysis, the thrombus area was numerically higher in both KIO and KBI than in the BD-DES. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis shows the highest degree of strut coating damage in the KBI group. This model demonstrated significant differences in CFD analysis at SB ostia with and without KBI optimization in the LM setting. The adoption of KBI was related to a meaningful reduction of flow disturbances in conventional DES and achieved results similar to BD-DES.

Indexed as

bifurcation lesionsdrug-eluting stentpolymers damageside branch ostia thrombogenicity

Identifiers

PMID35566886
PMCPMC9099851
OpenAlexW4224322940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.