Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35566770›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Comparison of the Oncological Outcomes of Open versus Laparoscopic Surgery for T2 Gallbladder Cancer: A Propensity-Score-Matched Analysis.

Jin-Kyu Cho, Jae-Ri Kim, Jae-Yool Jang, Han-Gil Kim, Jae-Myung Kim, Seung-Jin Kwag, Ji-Ho Park, Ju-Yeon Kim, Young-Tae Ju, Chi-Young Jeong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for gallbladder carcinoma: safety, feasibility, and oncological outcomes.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Article
  6. LaparoscopicWorld journal of clinical cases · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopicWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jin-Kyu ChoDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju 52727, Korea.
Jae-Ri KimDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, 11, Samjeongja-ro, Changwon-si 51472, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6865-1350
Jae-Yool JangDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, 11, Samjeongja-ro, Changwon-si 51472, Korea.
Han-Gil KimDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju 52727, Korea.
Jae-Myung KimDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju 52727, Korea.
Seung-Jin KwagDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju 52727, Korea.
Ji-Ho ParkDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju 52727, Korea.
Ju-Yeon KimDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju 52727, Korea.
Young-Tae JuDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju 52727, Korea.
Chi-Young JeongDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju 52727, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6877-7620
Gyeongsang National University Hospital · KRChangwon National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although laparoscopic treatment for T1 gallbladder cancer (GBC) has been described previously, the differences in oncologic outcomes between laparoscopic and conventional open surgery for T2 GBC have not been investigated. We aimed to assess the role of laparoscopic surgery using retrospectively collected data for 81 patients with T2 GBC who underwent surgical resection between January 2010 and December 2017. Eligible patients were classified into "laparoscopic" and "open" groups. Propensity-score matching was performed in a 1:1 ratio. The effects of surgery type on surgical and oncological outcomes were investigated. After propensity-score matching, 19 patients were included in the open and laparoscopic surgery groups. The median follow-up durations were 70 and 26 months in the open and laparoscopic groups, respectively. The operative time (316.8 ± 80.3 vs. 218.9 ± 145.0 min,

Indexed as

gallbladder carcinomalaparoscopyoncological outcome

Identifiers

PMID35566770
PMCPMC9099510
OpenAlexW4229336186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.