Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35566702›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Vertebral Body Tethering: Indications, Surgical Technique, and a Systematic Review of Published Results.

Arimatias Raitio, Johanna Syvänen, Ilkka Helenius

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Clinical outcomes and complications of the posterior dynamic distraction device in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arimatias RaitioDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20521 Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-9114-2204
Johanna SyvänenDepartment of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20521 Turku, Finland.
Ilkka HeleniusDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Topeliuksenkatu 5, 00260 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-5200-3279

Funding

Clinical Research Institute HUCH 20631Finnish State Funding Helsinki & Turku University HospitalsFinska Läkaresällskapet N/ALastentautien Tutkimussäätiö N/AMedtronic International ERP-2018-11372NuVasive (United States) N/APaulo Foundation N/AStryker N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) represents a new surgical technique to correct idiopathic scoliosis using an anterior approach, spinal instrumentation with vertebral body screws, and a cable compressing the convexity of the curve. According to the Hueter-Volkmann principle, compression reduces and distraction increases growth on the growth plates. VBT was designed to modulate spinal growth of vertebral bodies and hence, the term 'growth modulation' has also been used. This review describes the indications and surgical technique of VBT. Further, a systematic review of published studies was conducted to critically evaluate the results and complications of this technique. In a total of 23 included studies on 843 patients, the preoperative main thoracic curve corrected from 49 to 23 degrees in a minimum 2 year follow-up. The complication rate of VBT was 18%. The results showed that 15% of VBT patients required reoperations for pulmonary or tether-related issues (10%) and less than 5% required conversion to spinal fusion. While the reported median-term results of VBT appear promising, long-term results of this technique are currently lacking.

Indexed as

adolescent idiopathic scoliosisgrowth-friendly techniquessurgeryvertebral body tethering

Identifiers

PMID35566702
PMCPMC9099651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.