Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35566690›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Complex Telerehabilitation Intervention for Pediatric Acquired Brain Injury: The Child in Context Intervention (CICI).

Ingvil Laberg Holthe, Nina Rohrer-Baumgartner, Edel J Svendsen, Solveig Lægreid Hauger, Marit Vindal Forslund, Ida M H Borgen, Hege Prag Øra, Ingerid Kleffelgård, Anine Pernille Strand-Saugnes, Jens Egeland and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ingvil Laberg HoltheDepartment of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, 1453 Nesodden, Norway.
Nina Rohrer-BaumgartnerDepartment of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, 1453 Nesodden, Norway.
Edel J SvendsenDepartment of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, 1453 Nesodden, Norway.
Solveig Lægreid HaugerDepartment of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, 1453 Nesodden, Norway.
Marit Vindal ForslundDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Ida M H BorgenDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, 0317 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9163-6941
Hege Prag ØraDepartment of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, 1453 Nesodden, Norway.
Ingerid KleffelgårdDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Anine Pernille Strand-SaugnesDepartment of Acquired Brain Injury, Statped: Norwegian Service for Special Needs Education, 2815 Gjøvik, Norway.
Jens EgelandDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, 0317 Oslo, Norway.
Cecilie RøeResearch Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0372 Oslo, Norway.
Shari L WadeDivision of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
Marianne LøvstadDepartment of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, 1453 Nesodden, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NOSunnaas sykehus · NOCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USOsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NOStatped · NO

Funding

The Research Council of Norway 288172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study is a feasibility study of a randomized controlled trial (RCT): the Child in Context Intervention (CICI). The CICI study is an individualized, goal-oriented and home-based intervention conducted mainly through videoconference. It targets children with ongoing challenges (physical, cognitive, behavioral, social and/or psychological) after acquired brain injury (ABI) and their families at least one year post injury. The CICI feasibility study included six children aged 11-16 years with verified ABI-diagnosis, their families and their schools. The aim was to evaluate the feasibility of the intervention components, child and parent perceptions of usefulness and relevance of the intervention as well as the assessment protocol through a priori defined criteria. Overall, the families and therapists rated the intervention as feasible and acceptable, including the videoconference treatment delivery. However, the burden of assessment was too high. The SMART-goal approach was rated as useful, and goal attainment was high. The parents' ratings of acceptability of the intervention were somewhat higher than the children's. In conclusion, the CICI protocol proved feasible and acceptable to families, schools and therapists. The assessment burden was reduced, and adjustments in primary outcomes were made for the definitive RCT.

Indexed as

feasibility studygoal-oriented rehabilitationhome-based rehabilitationpediatric brain injurySMART-goals

Identifiers

PMID35566690
PMCPMC9103299
OpenAlexW4225302734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.