ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Canaloplasty in Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma. Can It Still Be Considered a Good Choice?
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ten-Year Results After Canaloplasty and Phacocanaloplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Historical and Contemporary Debates in Schlemm's Canal-Based MIGS.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Long-term outcomes of canaloplasty and phaco-canaloplasty in the treatment of open angle glaucoma: a single-surgeon experience.International ophthalmology · 2024Article
- It Is All about Pressure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Canaloplasty in the spotlight: surgical alternatives and future perspectives.Romanian journal of ophthalmologyReview
- Ab externo Schlemm's canal surgery: Efficacy and safety outcomes.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcomes of canaloplasty surgery in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PEXG) patients. Material and Methods: A total of 116 PEXG patients with an intraocular pressure (IOP) > 21 mm/Hg and maximum tolerated local medical therapy who underwent canaloplasty from February 2008 to January 2022 were considered. Every six months, all subjects underwent a complete ophthalmic examination. The period of follow-up ranged from 2 to 167 months. Inclusion criteria included only patients for whom the entire procedure could be completed with a follow-up of at least 2 years. Results: Amongst the 116 PEXG patients, the entire procedure could not be performed in 10 eyes (8.6%), and thus they were not considered in the analysis. Twenty-three patients did not reach the two-year follow-up and another 16 patients during this time period were lost. A total of 67 patients with a mean follow-up of 49 ± 32.3 months were considered in the analysis. The pre-operative mean IOP was 31.2 ± 8.7 mm/Hg (range 20−60). The mean IOP at the two-year follow-up was 17.2 ± 6.7 mmHg, with a mean reduction from baseline of 44.9%. After two years, the qualified success rates according to three different criteria (IOP ≤ 21, ≤18 and ≤16 mmHg) were 80.6%, 73.1% and 61.0%, respectively. The total number of medications used pre- and at the follow-up at 2 years was 3.5 ± 0.8 and 1.2 ± 1.4, respectively. Early complications included: hyphema, in about 30% of cases; Descemet membrane detachment (4.9%); and IOP spikes > 10 mmHg (9.7%). A late failure with an acute IOP rise of up to 50 mmHg was observed in 41 cases (61.2%) after 3 to 72 months. Conclusions: Long-term post-operative outcomes of canaloplasty in PEXG patients appear to be quite good on average; however, an acute rise in IOP can be observed in more than 60% of the cases after a long period of satisfactory IOP control. For this reason, canaloplasty may not be suitable in eyes with PEXG, especially in patients with severe functional damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.