Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35566649›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Specific Radiologic Risk Factors for Implant Failure and Osteonecrosis of the Humeral Head after Interlocking Nailing with the Targon PH

Maximilian Willauschus, Linus Schram, Michael Millrose, Johannes Rüther, Kim Loose, Hermann Josef Bail, Markus Geßlein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maximilian WillauschusDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Paracelsus Private Medical University Nuremberg, 90419 Nuremberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1267-200X
Linus SchramDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Paracelsus Private Medical University Nuremberg, 90419 Nuremberg, Germany.
Michael MillroseDepartment of Trauma Surgery and Sports Medicine, Garmisch-Partenkirchen Medical Centre, 82467 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
Johannes RütherDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Paracelsus Private Medical University Nuremberg, 90419 Nuremberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7010-8450
Kim LooseDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Paracelsus Private Medical University Nuremberg, 90419 Nuremberg, Germany.
Hermann Josef BailDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Paracelsus Private Medical University Nuremberg, 90419 Nuremberg, Germany.
Markus GeßleinDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Paracelsus Private Medical University Nuremberg, 90419 Nuremberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3863-1580
Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität · DEGarmisch-Partenkirchen Medical Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Operative management of proximal humeral fractures is still challenging. While antegrade nailing has become a valid option in fracture fixation, risk factors for adverse events, and failure have not been sufficiently clarified. Methods: All patients of a single trauma center undergoing surgery for proximal humeral fractures with the Targon PH+ nail between 2014 and 2021 were evaluated retrospectively. This included complications, revisions, and failures. Pre- and postoperative radiographic imaging were assessed regarding fracture’s complexity, anatomic reduction, reconstruction of the medial hinge, metaphyseal head extension, and fixation of the implant in the calcar region. Follow-up was at a minimum of 12 months. Results: A total number of 130 patients with a mean age of 74.5 years (range 63−94, SD ± 8.2) are included in this study. Two- and three-part fractures were found in 58 patients, while 14 patients showed four-part fractures. Overall, a complication rate of 34.2% and an implant failure rate of 15.4% was found. Four-part fractures showed a significantly higher complication rate than two- and three-part fractures. Four-part fractures also showed significantly higher revisions (p = 0.005) and implant failures (p = 0.008). The nonsufficient anatomical reduction was found to be a risk factor for complications (p < 0.0001), implant failures (p < 0.0001), and later humeral head osteonecrosis (p < 0.0001). Insufficiently reconstructed medial hinges (p = 0.002) and a metaphyseal head extension of under 8 mm (p = 0.005) were also demonstrated as risk factors for osteonecrosis of the humeral head. Conclusions: Four-part fractures in an elderly population show high complication, revision, and implant-failure rates. Therefore, demonstrated radiologic risk factors should be evaluated for improvements. Anatomical reduction and fixation near the calcar proved to be vital for successful antegrade nailing of complex fractures. To prevent osteonecrosis of the humeral head, reconstruction of the medial hinge and metaphyseal head extension should be evaluated.

Indexed as

complicationshumeral head necrosisimplant failureinterlocking antegrade nailingproximal humeral fracturesrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID35566649
PMCPMC9103667
OpenAlexW4225133158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.