Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35566615›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Long-Term Outcomes of Implants Placed in Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with Porous Fluorohydroxyapatite (Algipore

Biagio Rapone, Alessio Danilo Inchingolo, Stefano Trasarti, Elisabetta Ferrara, Erda Qorri, Antonio Mancini, Nicola Montemurro, Antonio Scarano, Angelo Michele Inchingolo, Gianna Dipalma and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Retrospective Descriptive Case Series on the Use of AMCOPBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Biagio RaponeInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0062-6594
Alessio Danilo InchingoloInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6366-1039
Stefano TrasartiDepartment of European Studies Jean Monnet of Lugano, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland.
Elisabetta FerraraComplex Operative Unit of Odontostomatology, Hospital S.S. Annunziata, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4831-4098
Erda QorriDean Faculty of Medical Sciences, Albanian University, Bulevardi Zogu I, Tirana 1001, Albania.ORCID 0000-0002-5079-6815
Antonio ManciniInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7103-4086
Nicola MontemurroDepartment of Neurosurgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana (AOUP), University of Pisa, 56100 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3686-8907
Antonio ScaranoDepartment of Oral Science, Nano and Biotechnology, CaSt-Met University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1374-6146
Angelo Michele InchingoloInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy.
Gianna DipalmaInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5947-8987
Francesco InchingoloInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3797-5883
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITAlbanian University · ALOspedale SS. Annunziata · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of bone regeneration procedures using algae-derived plant hydroxyapatite (Algipore MATERIALS AND

methodsPartially edentulous patients with severe atrophy of posterior maxillary treated by means of the split bone technique in a two-stage grafting procedures were observed for up to seven years after implants placement. After surgeries, the natural porous fluorohydroxyapatite (FHA) (Algipore

resultsA sample of fifty-seven consecutive patients who required sinus augmentation was included in the study, and 57 implants were placed. There was no drop out or loss of follow-up of any case. Clinical and radiographic examinations revealed a comparable pattern of newly formed bone in both groups after seven years of functional loading for implants placed after sinus augmentation using porous fluorohydroxyapatite and anorganic bovine bone. No significant difference in marginal bone loss was found around implants in both groups.

conclusionsThe favorable implant outcomes suggest both biomaterials are suitable for sinus grafting in severely atrophic maxillae.

Indexed as

autogenous bonebiomaterialsimplantjawbone reconstructionpiezosurgerysinus floor augmentationvestibular region

Identifiers

PMID35566615
PMCPMC9105692
OpenAlexW4225163127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.