Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35566599›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Neuroimaging Techniques as Potential Tools for Assessment of Angiogenesis and Neuroplasticity Processes after Stroke and Their Clinical Implications for Rehabilitation and Stroke Recovery Prognosis.

Lidia Włodarczyk, Natalia Cichon, Joanna Saluk-Bijak, Michal Bijak, Agata Majos, Elzbieta Miller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lidia WłodarczykDepartment of Neurological Rehabilitation, Medical University of Lodz, Poland Milionowa 14, 93-113 Lodz, Poland.
Natalia CichonBiohazard Prevention Centre, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Pomorska, 141/143, 90-236 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0139-2451
Joanna Saluk-BijakDepartment of General Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Pomorska, 141/143, 90-236 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1197-1713
Michal BijakBiohazard Prevention Centre, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Pomorska, 141/143, 90-236 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7838-4097
Agata MajosDepartment of Radiological and Isotopic Diagnosis and Therapy, Medical University of Lodz, 92-213 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4141-0191
Elzbieta MillerDepartment of Neurological Rehabilitation, Medical University of Lodz, Poland Milionowa 14, 93-113 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7029-1857

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke as the most frequent cause of disability is a challenge for the healthcare system as well as an important socio-economic issue. Therefore, there are currently a lot of studies dedicated to stroke recovery. Stroke recovery processes include angiogenesis and neuroplasticity and advances in neuroimaging techniques may provide indirect description of this action and become quantifiable indicators of these processes as well as responses to the therapeutical interventions. This means that neuroimaging and neurophysiological methods can be used as biomarkers-to make a prognosis of the course of stroke recovery and define patients with great potential of improvement after treatment. This approach is most likely to lead to novel rehabilitation strategies based on categorizing individuals for personalized treatment. In this review article, we introduce neuroimaging techniques dedicated to stroke recovery analysis with reference to angiogenesis and neuroplasticity processes. The most beneficial for personalized rehabilitation are multimodal panels of stroke recovery biomarkers, including neuroimaging and neurophysiological, genetic-molecular and clinical scales.

Indexed as

angiogenesisneuroimagingneuroplasticityneurorehabilitationrecoverystroke

Identifiers

PMID35566599
PMCPMC9103133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.