Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35566526›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Potential Values of Circulating microRNA-21 to Predict Early Recurrence in Patients with Colorectal Cancer after Treatments.

Yun-Jie Hao, Chih-Yung Yang, Ming-Hsien Chen, Lu-Wey Chang, Chien-Ping Lin, Liang-Chuan Lo, Sheng-Chieh Huang, You-You Lyu, Jeng-Kai Jiang, Fan-Gang Tseng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic value of extracellular vesicles in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yun-Jie HaoDepartment of Engineering and System Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.
Chih-Yung YangDepartment of Teaching and Research, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei 10341, Taiwan.
Ming-Hsien ChenDepartment of Engineering and System Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.
Lu-Wey ChangDepartment of Engineering and System Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.
Chien-Ping LinInstitute of Microbiology and Immunology, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan.
Liang-Chuan LoInstitute of Microbiology and Immunology, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan.
Sheng-Chieh HuangSchool of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan.
You-You LyuInstitute of Microbiology and Immunology, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan.
Jeng-Kai JiangSchool of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan.
Fan-Gang TsengDepartment of Engineering and System Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7654-6905
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWNational Tsing Hua University · TWNational United University · TWUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

the Ministry of Education, Taiwan MOST 108-3017-F-007-0032 and OE110QR001I5the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST108-2638-E-007-001-MY2the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST110-2731-M-007-001the Veterans General Hospital and University System of the Taiwan Joint Research Program VGHUST109-V6-1-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insufficient prognosis of local recurrence contributes to the poor progression-free survival rate and death in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Various biomarkers have been explored in predicting CRC recurrence. This study investigated the expressions of plasma/exosomal microRNA-21 (miR-21) in 113 CRC patients by qPCR, their values of predicting CRC recurrence, and the possibility to improve the prognostic efficacy in early CRC recurrence in stratified patients by combined biomarkers including circulating miR-21s, circulating tumour cells/microemboli (CTCs/CTM), and serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)/carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9). Expressions of plasma and exosomal miR-21s were significantly correlated (p < 0.0001) in all and late-stage patients, presenting similar correlations with other biomarkers. However, stage IV patients stratified by a high level of exosomal miR-21 and stage I to III patients stratified by a high level of plasma miR-21 displayed significantly worse survival outcomes in predicting CRC recurrence, suggesting their different values to predict CRC recurrence in stratified patients. Comparable and even better performances in predicting CRC recurrence in late-stage patients were found by CTCs/CTM from our blood samples as sensitive biomarkers. Improved prognosing efficacy in CRC recurrence and better outcomes to significantly differentiate recurrence in stratified patients could be obtained by analysing combined biomarkers.

Indexed as

carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9)carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)circulating tumour cells (CTCs)circulating tumour microemboli (CTM)colorectal cancer (CRC)exosomal microRNA21 (exo-miR-21)peripheral blood (PB)plasma microRNA21 (miR-21)prognosisrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID35566526
PMCPMC9100254
OpenAlexW4224440143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.