ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022
3D Printing and Virtual Surgical Planning in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06603831 (Randomized, Prospective and Multicenter Clinical Study for the Clinical Evaluation and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of 3D Digital Surgery in Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized, Prospective and Multicenter Clinical Study for the Clinical Evaluation and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of 3D Digital Surgery in Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient-specific guides and osteosynthesis versus CAD/CAM occlusal splints in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of accuracy, operative time, and complications.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Clinician-Recorded Temporomandibular Disorder at 12 Months After Digitally Planned Mandibular Fracture Repair: Associations with Condylar Injury and Early Functional Signs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Three-dimensional virtual planning reduces operative time in orthognathic surgery: a procedure-specific retrospective study incorporating additive manufacturing.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Article
- Innovations Driving the Future of Maxillofacial Prosthetics, Part I: The Technological Leap in Maxillofacial Rehabilitation.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- B-onic Platform: A Single-Center Clinical Evaluation of an Integrated FabLab Workflow for Patient-Specific Surgical Planning and XR-Based Validation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing in Dentistry: Evolution, Technologies, and Clinical Application.Polymers · 2026Review
- Academic Point-of-Care Manufacturing in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Retrospective Review at Gregorio Marañón University Hospital.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis Guided by 3D Model and Monitored with Ultrasonography: A Case Report.Pediatric reports · 2026Article
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Current Updates and Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Custom 3D implants for managing bone defects-indications and lessons learned.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Review
- A single-center 3D reconstruction image dataset for exploring inferior mesenteric artery and vein types.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Precision of patient specific screw holes locating surgical guide and pre-bent plates osteosynthesis versus classical workflow in management of class III mandibular fracture.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
- Evaluation of 3D planning in orthognathic surgery.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Image Sensor-Driven 3D Modeling of Complex Biological Surfaces for Preoperative Planning of Hemangioma Treatment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- 3D Printing and Virtual Surgical Planning in Craniofacial and Thoracic Surgery: Applications to Personalised Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Precision and Efficacy of Digital Technology in Orthognathic Surgery for Facial Asymmetry Correction: A Quantitative Analysis.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Management of Edentulous and Atrophic Mandibular Fractures: A Systematic Review of Treatment Modalities and Outcomes.Cureus · 2025Review
- Evaluating Virtual Planning Accuracy in Bimaxillary Advancement Surgery: A Retrospective Study Introducing the Planning Accuracy Coefficient.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Current Trends and Innovations in Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstruction.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Review
- Evaluating Osteotomy Accuracy in Mandibular Reconstruction: A Preliminary Study Using Custom Cutting Guides and Virtual Reality.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compared to traditional manufacturing methods, additive manufacturing and 3D printing stand out in their ability to rapidly fabricate complex structures and precise geometries. The growing need for products with different designs, purposes and materials led to the development of 3D printing, serving as a driving force for the 4th industrial revolution and digitization of manufacturing. 3D printing has had a global impact on healthcare, with patient-customized implants now replacing generic implantable medical devices. This revolution has had a particularly significant impact on oral and maxillofacial surgery, where surgeons rely on precision medicine in everyday practice. Trauma, orthognathic surgery and total joint replacement therapy represent several examples of treatments improved by 3D technologies. The widespread and rapid implementation of 3D technologies in clinical settings has led to the development of point-of-care treatment facilities with in-house infrastructure, enabling surgical teams to participate in the 3D design and manufacturing of devices. 3D technologies have had a tremendous impact on clinical outcomes and on the way clinicians approach treatment planning. The current review offers our perspective on the implementation of 3D-based technologies in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery, while indicating major clinical applications. Moreover, the current report outlines the 3D printing point-of-care concept in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.