ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Multimodal Evaluation of Long-Term Salivary Gland Alterations in Sarcoidosis.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative Assessment of Vascularization and Stiffness in Salivary Glands During Pregnancy Using Superb Microvascular Imaging and Shear Wave Elastography Techniques.Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU · 2026Article
- Persisting sicca complaints in sarcoidosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSarcoidosis is a systemic inflammatory disease characterized by non-caseating granulomas. In addition to the lungs as classical site of affection, extrapulmonary manifestations are common, for example in the cervical lymph nodes or the salivary glands. The aim of this investigation is the analysis of the long-term course of glandular symptoms and the sonographic evaluation of long-term salivary gland changes. MATERIAL AND
methodsAll patients with a diagnosis of sarcoidosis over a period of 20 years in the departments of otorhinolaryngology, rheumatology, and pneumology were identified. In addition to clinical examinations and functional evaluation of the salivary glands, a sonographic examination of the salivary glands was carried out. The changes in the area of the salivary glands were assessed using B-mode sonography and different elastographic methods with appropriate scoring systems.
resultsA total of 76 patients were included in the study (age 35.1 ± 21.6 years). Overall, 17 patients presented with salivary gland manifestation at the time of the initial diagnosis. Of these patients, 15 received steroid therapy, 6 were also treated with another drug, and 2 patients were not treated with drugs. The time span between initial diagnosis and follow-up was 88.2 months (±83.0). At the time of the initial diagnosis, 17/17 complained of swelling of the salivary glands, 9/17 of xerostomia, and 8/17 of pain in the area of the salivary glands. At the time of follow-up, 5/17 reported swelling of the salivary glands, 6/17 reported xerostomia, and 1/17 reported pain in the salivary gland area. Sonography showed sonomorphological abnormalities of the salivary glands only in individual cases, with only mild alterations on average.
conclusionIn summary, it can be observed that patients with initial symptoms in the area of the salivary glands, such as swelling or pain, also suffer more frequently from dry mouth and eyes. In all patients, however, these symptoms regressed over time. A previous diagnosis of sarcoidosis with involvement of the salivary glands only leads to permanent abnormalities in the area of the salivary glands in individual cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.