Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35566099›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Development, In-Vitro Characterization and Preclinical Evaluation of Esomeprazole-Encapsulated Proniosomal Formulation for the Enhancement of Anti-Ulcer Activity.

Dibyalochan Mohanty, Ameeduzzafar Zafar, Mohammed Jafar, Atul Kumar Upadhyay, Mohammad Akiful Haque, Jeetendra Kumar Gupta, Vasudha Bakshi, Mohammed M Ghoneim, Sultan Alshehri, Mohammed Asadullah Jahangir and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bridging bioactive metabolites ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Formulation of Glibenclamide proniosomes for oral administration: Pharmaceutical and pharmacodynamics evaluation.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Dibyalochan MohantyDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Anurag University, Hyderabad 500088, India.
Ameeduzzafar ZafarDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72341, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed JafarDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Clinical Pharmacy, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 34212, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-3581-0877
Atul Kumar UpadhyayDepartment of Biotechnology, Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology, Patila 147001, India.
Mohammad Akiful HaqueDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Anurag University, Hyderabad 500088, India.
Jeetendra Kumar GuptaInstitute of Pharmaceutical Research, GLA University, Mathura 281406, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5819-371X
Vasudha BakshiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Anurag University, Hyderabad 500088, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0819-2532
Mohammed M GhoneimDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Al-Maarefa University, Ad Diriyah 13713, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9179-4373
Sultan AlshehriDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0922-9819
Mohammed Asadullah JahangirDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Nibha Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rajgir 803116, India.
Mohammed Javed AnsariDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, AlKharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Advanced Numerical Research and Analysis Group · INGLA University · INImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SAJouf University · SAKing Saud University · SAPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SAThapar Institute of Engineering & Technology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The present study aimed to develop and optimize esomeprazole loaded proniosomes (EZL-PNs) to improve bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy. Method: EZL-PNs formulation was developed by slurry method and optimized by 33 box-Bhekhen statistical design software. Span 60 (surfactant), cholesterol, EZL concentration were taken as independent variables and their effects were evaluated on vesicle size (nm), entrapment efficiency (%, EE) and drug release (%, DR). Furthermore, optimized EZL-PNs (EZL-PNs-opt) formulation was evaluated for ex vivo permeation, pharmacokinetic and ulcer protection activity. Result: The EZL-PNs-opt formulation showed 616 ± 13.21 nm of vesicle size, and 81.21 ± 2.35% of EE. EZL-PNs-opt exhibited negative zeta potential and spherical confirmed scanning electron microscopy. EZL-PNs-opt showed sustained release of EZL (95.07 ± 2.10% in 12 h) than pure EZL dispersion. The ex-vivo gut permeation result exhibited a significantly (p < 0.05) enhanced flux than pure EZL. The in vivo results revealed 4.02-fold enhancement in bioavailability and 61.65% protection in ulcer than pure EZL dispersion (43.82%). Conclusion: Our findings revealed that EZL-PNs formulation could be an alternative delivery system of EZL to enhance oral bioavailability and antiulcer activity.

Indexed as

EsomeprazoleUlcerAdministration, CutaneousBiological AvailabilityDrug CarriersDrug LiberationHumansParticle SizeDrug CarriersEsomeprazoleAnti-ulcer activityBox–Behnken statistical designesomeprazolepharmacokineticproniosomes

Identifiers

PMID35566099
PMCPMC9101870
OpenAlexW4224926095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.