Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35566059›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Comparative Study of the Synthetic Approaches and Biological Activities of the Bioisosteres of 1,3,4-Oxadiazoles and 1,3,4-Thiadiazoles over the Past Decade.

Rana M El-Masry, Hanan H Kadry, Azza T Taher, Sahar M Abou-Seri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Novel furo[2,3-RSC medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. An Electrosynthesis of 1,3,4-Oxadiazoles from N-Acyl Hydrazones.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Antimicrobial Potency andMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rana M El-MasryOrganic Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts (MSA), 6th of October City 12451, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-7280-1788
Hanan H KadryDepartment of Pharmaceutical Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo 11562, Egypt.
Azza T TaherDepartment of Pharmaceutical Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo 11562, Egypt.
Sahar M Abou-SeriDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo 11562, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bioisosteres of 1,3,4-oxadiazoles and 1,3,4-thiadiazoles are well-known pharmacophores for many medicinally important drugs. Throughout the past 10 years, 1,3,4-oxa-/thiadiazole nuclei have been very attractive to researchers for drug design, synthesis, and the study of their potential activity towards a variety of diseases, including microbial and viral infections, cancer, diabetes, pain, and inflammation. This work is an up-to-date comparative study that identifies the differences between 1,3,4-thiadiazoles and 1,3,4-oxadiazoles concerning their methods of synthesis from different classes of starting compounds under various reaction conditions, as well as their biological activities and structure-activity relationship.

Indexed as

ThiadiazolesDrug DesignOxadiazolesStructure-Activity RelationshipOxadiazolesThiadiazoles1,3,4-oxadiazole1,3,4-thiadiazolebioisosteresbiological activitystructure–activity relationshipsynthesis

Identifiers

PMID35566059
PMCPMC9102899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.