Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35565900›Full record

ArticleNutrients2022

Development and Validation of a Food and Nutrition Literacy Questionnaire for Chinese Adults.

Yaqin Zhang, Zhaofeng Zhang, Meihong Xu, Sumiya Aihemaitijiang, Chen Ye, Wenli Zhu, Guansheng Ma

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07051733 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Preliminary Effect of a Health Information Literacy Enhancement Program for Community-dwelling Individuals With Metabolic Syndrome: A Feasibility Study Based on the Health Empowerment Theory

TypeinterventionalSponsorMeihua JiRan2025 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsMetabolic Syndrome (MetS)ArmsHealth Information Literacy Enhancement
NCT07096102 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of a Health Empowerment Theory Based Health Information Literacy Promotion Intervention in Individuals With Metabolic Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorMeihua JiRan2025 to 2026Enrolled310ConditionsMetabolic Syndrome (MetS)ArmsENRICH Group, Routine Care Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yaqin ZhangDepartment of Nutrition & Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
Zhaofeng ZhangDepartment of Nutrition & Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9751-1549
Meihong XuDepartment of Nutrition & Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7201-6982
Sumiya AihemaitijiangDepartment of Nutrition & Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
Chen YeDepartment of Nutrition & Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
Wenli ZhuDepartment of Nutrition & Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
Guansheng MaDepartment of Nutrition & Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8022-4597

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study aimed to develop and validate the Food and Nutrition Literacy Questionnaire for Chinese adults (FNLQ). The dimensions and core components of Food and Nutrition Literacy were constructed though literature review and qualitative consensus study. A cross-sectional survey of 8510 participants was conducted. The reliability of the questionnaire was determined by internal consistency, the construct validity was assessed by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and the content validity was assessed by the Pearson correlation coefficient. From the literature review and qualitative methods, 20 core components and 50 questions of the FNLQ were developed, including 1 dimension of knowledge and 3 practice dimensions (ability of selection, preparing food and eating). The overall FNLQ questionnaire had good reliability and validity (Cronbach’s α = 0.893, χ2/DF = 4.750, RMSEA = 0.048, GFI = 0.891 and AGFI = 0.876). The average FNLQ score of all participants was (64.08 ± 12.77), and the score for the knowledge and understanding dimension was higher than that for the practice dimensions. In addition, 80 was set as the nutritional literacy threshold, and only 12.2% met this threshold in this survey. Sociodemographic and health status characteristics were predictors of FNLQ (R2 = 0.287, F = 244.132, p < 0.01). In conclusion, the FNLQ built in this study had good validity and reliability. It could be considered as a reliable tool to assess Food and Nutrition Literacy of Chinese adults.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyAdultChinaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesChinese adultsfood and nutrition literacyquestionnaire developmentvalidation

Identifiers

PMID35565900
PMCPMC9104569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.