Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35565896›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2022

Short-Term Very High Carbohydrate Diet and Gut-Training Have Minor Effects on Gastrointestinal Status and Performance in Highly Trained Endurance Athletes.

Andy J King, Naroa Etxebarria, Megan L Ross, Laura Garvican-Lewis, Ida A Heikura, Alannah K A McKay, Nicolin Tee, Sara F Forbes, Nicole A Beard, Philo U Saunders and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Andy J KingExercise & Nutrition Research Program, The Mary Mackillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3647-7025
Naroa EtxebarriaResearch Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0642-8230
Megan L RossExercise & Nutrition Research Program, The Mary Mackillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia.
Laura Garvican-LewisExercise & Nutrition Research Program, The Mary Mackillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia.
Ida A HeikuraExercise & Nutrition Research Program, The Mary Mackillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia.
Alannah K A McKayExercise & Nutrition Research Program, The Mary Mackillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia.
Nicolin TeeAustralian Institute of Sport, Leverrier Street, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1130-9516
Sara F ForbesUniSA Online, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6726-9328
Nicole A BeardFaculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia.
Philo U SaundersAustralian Institute of Sport, Leverrier Street, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia.
Avish P SharmaSchool of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia.
Stephanie K GaskellDepartment of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC 3800, Australia.
Ricardo J S CostaDepartment of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC 3800, Australia.
Louise M BurkeExercise & Nutrition Research Program, The Mary Mackillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8866-5637
Australian Catholic University · AUMonash University · AUUniversity of Canberra · AUGriffith University · AUUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

The alliance for potato research and education 1a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We implemented a multi-pronged strategy (MAX) involving chronic (2 weeks high carbohydrate [CHO] diet + gut-training) and acute (CHO loading + 90 g·h−1 CHO during exercise) strategies to promote endogenous and exogenous CHO availability, compared with strategies reflecting lower ranges of current guidelines (CON) in two groups of athletes. Nineteen elite male race walkers (MAX: 9; CON:10) undertook a 26 km race-walking session before and after the respective interventions to investigate gastrointestinal function (absorption capacity), integrity (epithelial injury), and symptoms (GIS). We observed considerable individual variability in responses, resulting in a statistically significant (p < 0.001) yet likely clinically insignificant increase (Δ 736 pg·mL−1) in I-FABP after exercise across all trials, with no significant differences in breath H2 across exercise (p = 0.970). MAX was associated with increased GIS in the second half of the exercise, especially in upper GIS (p < 0.01). Eighteen highly trained male and female distance runners (MAX: 10; CON: 8) then completed a 35 km run (28 km steady-state + 7 km time-trial) supported by either a slightly modified MAX or CON strategy. Inter-individual variability was observed, without major differences in epithelial cell intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP) or GIS, due to exercise, trial, or group, despite the 3-fold increase in exercise CHO intake in MAX post-intervention. The tight-junction (claudin-3) response decreased in both groups from pre- to post-intervention. Groups achieved a similar performance improvement from pre- to post-intervention (CON = 39 s [95 CI 15−63 s]; MAX = 36 s [13−59 s]; p = 0.002). Although this suggests that further increases in CHO availability above current guidelines do not confer additional advantages, limitations in our study execution (e.g., confounding loss of BM in several individuals despite a live-in training camp environment and significant increases in aerobic capacity due to intensified training) may have masked small differences. Therefore, athletes should meet the minimum CHO guidelines for training and competition goals, noting that, with practice, increased CHO intake can be tolerated, and may contribute to performance outcomes.

Indexed as

Dietary CarbohydratesPhysical EnduranceAthletesDietFemaleHumansMaleWalkingDietary Carbohydratesathletic performancebreath hydrogenclaudin-3exercisegastrointestinal symptomsintestinal fatty acid binding proteinmarathonnutritionrunning

Identifiers

PMID35565896
PMCPMC9105618
OpenAlexW4229040251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.