Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35565840›Full record

ArticleNutrients2022

Screening for Low Energy Availability in Male Athletes: Attempted Validation of LEAM-Q.

Bronwen Lundy, Monica K Torstveit, Thomas B Stenqvist, Louise M Burke, Ina Garthe, Gary J Slater, Christian Ritz, Anna K Melin

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06371963 (The Relative Energy Deficiency in Sports), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06371963 completednot on this map

The Relative Energy Deficiency in Sports (REDs) in Swedish Athletes Study

TypeobservationalSponsorLinnaeus UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled44ConditionsRED S, Eating Disorders
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bronwen LundyRowing Australia, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7718-611X
Monica K TorstveitDepartment of Sport Science and Physical Education, Faculty of Health and Sport Science, University of Agder, 4630 Kristiansand, Norway.
Thomas B StenqvistDepartment of Sport Science and Physical Education, Faculty of Health and Sport Science, University of Agder, 4630 Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6937-6917
Louise M BurkeMary MacKillop Institute of Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8866-5637
Ina GartheNorwegian Olympic Sports Centre, Department of Sports Nutrition, 0806 Oslo, Norway.
Gary J SlaterSchool of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD 4556, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2753-7847
Christian RitzNational Institute of Public Health-SDU, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5095-0624
Anna K MelinDepartment of Sport Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, Linnaeus University, 351 95 Vaxjo, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A questionnaire-based screening tool for male athletes at risk of low energy availability (LEA) could facilitate both research and clinical practice. The present options rely on proxies for LEA such screening tools for disordered eating, exercise dependence, or those validated in female athlete populations. in which the female-specific sections are excluded. To overcome these limitations and support progress in understanding LEA in males, centres in Australia, Norway, Denmark, and Sweden collaborated to develop a screening tool (LEAM-Q) based on clinical investigations of elite and sub-elite male athletes from multiple countries and ethnicities, and a variety of endurance and weight-sensitive sports. A bank of questions was developed from previously validated questionnaires and expert opinion on various clinical markers of LEA in athletic or eating disorder populations, dizziness, thermoregulation, gastrointestinal symptoms, injury, illness, wellbeing, recovery, sleep and sex drive. The validation process covered reliability, content validity, a multivariate analysis of associations between variable responses and clinical markers, and Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve analysis of variables, with the inclusion threshold being set at 60% sensitivity. Comparison of the scores of the retained questionnaire variables between subjects classified as cases or controls based on clinical markers of LEA revealed an internal consistency and reliability of 0.71. Scores for sleep and thermoregulation were not associated with any clinical marker and were excluded from any further analysis. Of the remaining variables, dizziness, illness, fatigue, and sex drive had sufficient sensitivity to be retained in the questionnaire, but only low sex drive was able to distinguish between LEA cases and controls and was associated with perturbations in key clinical markers and questionnaire responses. In summary, in this large and international cohort, low sex drive was the most effective self-reported symptom in identifying male athletes requiring further clinical assessment for LEA.

Indexed as

AthletesDizzinessBiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSports Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaSurveys and QuestionnairesBiomarkersEHMCendurancequestionnairetestosteronevalidation

Identifiers

PMID35565840
PMCPMC9101736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.