ReviewNutrients2022
PN Administration in Critically Ill Children in Different Phases of the Stress Response.
Review in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Identifying a Safety Threshold for Parenteral Glucose Intake in the Early Acute Phase of Preterm Neonates.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Interruptions in nutritional therapy in children with chronic diseases during the acute phase of critical illness and their effect on the administered volume.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Personalized Nutrition in the Pediatric ICU: Steering the Shift from Acute Stress to Metabolic Recovery and Rehabilitation.Nutrients · 2024Review
- Trajectories of resting energy expenditure and performance of predictive equations in children hospitalized with an acute illness and malnutrition: a longitudinal study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Impact of Total Parenteral Nutrition on Gut Microbiota in Pediatric Population Suffering Intestinal Disorders.Nutrients · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nutritional support is an important part of the treatment of critical ill children and the phase of disease has to be taken into account. The metabolic stress response during acute critical illness is characterized by severe catabolism. So far, there is no evidence that the acute catabolic state can be prevented with nutritional support. The Pediatric 'Early versus Late Parenteral Nutrition' (PEPaNIC) trial showed that withholding supplemental parenteral nutrition (PN) during the first week in critically ill children, when enteral nutrition was not sufficient, prevented infections and shortened the stay in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and the hospital. A follow-up performed 2 and 4 years later showed that withholding parenteral nutrition (PN) also improved several domains of the neurocognitive outcome of the children. Current international guidelines recommend considering withholding parenteral macronutrients during the first week of pediatric critical illness, while providing micronutrients. These guidelines also recommend upper and lower levels of intake of macronutrients and micronutrients if PN is administered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.