Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35565756›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2022

Measures of Perceived Neighborhood Food Environments and Dietary Habits: A Systematic Review of Methods and Associations.

Miwa Yamaguchi, Panrawee Praditsorn, Sintha Dewi Purnamasari, Kitti Sranacharoenpong, Yusuke Arai, Samantha M Sundermeir, Joel Gittelsohn, Hamam Hadi, Nobuo Nishi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Perception of the Food Environment and Food Security Levels of Residents of the City of Rio de Janeiro.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Miwa YamaguchiInternational Center for Nutrition and Information, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, 1-23-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8636, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6084-1539
Panrawee PraditsornInstitute of Nutrition, Mahidol University, 999 Phuttamonthon 4, Salaya, Phuttamonthon, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-0106-3703
Sintha Dewi PurnamasariAlma Ata Graduate School of Public Health, University of Alma Ata, Jl. Brawijaya 99, Tamantirto, Yogyakarta 55183, Indonesia.
Kitti SranacharoenpongInstitute of Nutrition, Mahidol University, 999 Phuttamonthon 4, Salaya, Phuttamonthon, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-1692-9645
Yusuke AraiDepartment of Nutrition, Chiba Prefectural University of Health Sciences, 2-10-1 Wakaba, Mihama-ku, Chiba-shi 261-0014, Japan.
Samantha M SundermeirCenter for Human Nutrition, Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, 615 North Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4471-0621
Joel GittelsohnCenter for Human Nutrition, Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, 615 North Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2761-3280
Hamam HadiAlma Ata Graduate School of Public Health, University of Alma Ata, Jl. Brawijaya 99, Tamantirto, Yogyakarta 55183, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-1945-2539
Nobuo NishiInternational Center for Nutrition and Information, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, 1-23-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8636, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5772-6561

Funding

Clinical Research&Epidemiology in Diabetes&EndocrinologyT32DK062707 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TODD T BROWN, Wendy Lynet Bennett · 2002 to 2026
$7.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK062707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to healthy food is a necessity for all people. However, there is still a lack of reviews on the assessment of respondent-based measures of neighborhood food environments (perceived food environments). The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the measurement tools for perceived food environments by five dimensions of food access and to obtain the overview of their associations with dietary habits among people aged 18 years and older in middle- and high-income countries. Observational studies using perceived food environment measures were identified through a systematic review based on two databases for original studies published from 2010 to 2020. A total of 19 final studies were extracted from totally 2926 studies. Pertaining to the five dimensions of food access, 12 studies dealt with

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorFood SupplyDietFoodHumansResidence Characteristicsfood accessfood environmentsperceived measurements

Identifiers

PMID35565756
PMCPMC9099956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.