Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35565674›Full record

ArticleNutrients2022

Testing the Impact of Familiarity with Health Benefits Information on Dietary Supplement Choice in Pregnancy: An Online Choice Experiment.

Lenka Malek, Wendy J Umberger, Shao-Jia Zhou, Elisabeth Huynh, Maria Makrides

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lenka MalekCentre for Global Food and Resources, Faculty of Arts, Business, Law and Economics, The University of Adelaide, Level 6 NEXUS 10 Tower, 10 Pulteney Street, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4973-959X
Wendy J UmbergerCentre for Global Food and Resources, Faculty of Arts, Business, Law and Economics, The University of Adelaide, Level 6 NEXUS 10 Tower, 10 Pulteney Street, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4159-7782
Shao-Jia ZhouSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Campus, The University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Adelaide, SA 5064, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4012-983X
Elisabeth HuynhDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, ANU College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2006, Australia.
Maria MakridesSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Campus, The University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Adelaide, SA 5064, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3832-541X

Funding

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation NANational Health and Medical Research Council NAUniversity of Adelaide NAWomen's and Children's Health Research Institute NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To help meet the increased requirements for critical nutrients during and around pregnancy, supplementation with essential nutrients is recommended. This study aims to determine how the previous awareness of nutrient health benefits and/or the provision of this information influences the importance placed on nutrients (folate, iodine, omega-3 fatty acids, and vitamin D) when choosing between dietary supplement products for pregnancy. Discrete choice experiment data were collected as part of a cross-sectional online survey administered to 857 pregnant women living in Australia. Four segments of women were identified that differ in their preference criteria when choosing among dietary supplement products for pregnancy. When choosing between products, the reinforcement of perceived health benefits (i.e., showing information on health benefits to those already aware of the benefits) was most effective at increasing the importance of folate (in all segments) and iodine (in two segments, 63% of the sample). Neither prior awareness of health benefits alone nor information provided at the point-of-purchase without prior awareness were enough to increase the importance of folate. Our findings suggest a need for simultaneous strategies that (1) provide information on health benefits before purchase and (2) ensure that information on health benefits is available at the point-of-purchase.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsIodineCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFolic AcidHumansPregnancyVitaminsFolic AcidIodineVitaminsawarenessdietary supplementsdiscrete choice experimentfolic acidfood choicehealth benefitsiodinenutrient recommendationsnutrition knowledgepregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35565674
PMCPMC9105683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.