Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35565507›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Comparing the Effects of a Pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) Bark Extract with a Quebracho (Schinopsis balansae Engl.) Extract on Methane Production and In Vitro Rumen Fermentation Parameters

Nelson Vera, Constanza Gutiérrez-Gómez, Pamela Williams, Rodrigo Allende, Cecilia Fuentealba, Jorge Ávila-Stagno

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chemical Characterization and Rumen-Modulating Effects ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Synergistic effects ofVeterinary world · 2026
    Article
  4. Bio-mordants: a review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Effects of addingFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nelson VeraDepartamento de Ciencia Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de Concepción, Campus Chillán, Chillán 3812120, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-6467-6411
Constanza Gutiérrez-GómezDepartamento de Ciencia Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de Concepción, Campus Chillán, Chillán 3812120, Chile.
Pamela WilliamsDepartamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Concepción, Campus Chillán, Chillán 3812120, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-7834-6704
Rodrigo AllendeDepartamento de Ciencia Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de Concepción, Campus Chillán, Chillán 3812120, Chile.
Cecilia FuentealbaUnidad de Desarrollo Tecnológico, Universidad de Concepción, Coronel 4190000, Chile.
Jorge Ávila-StagnoDepartamento de Ciencia Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de Concepción, Campus Chillán, Chillán 3812120, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-1831-4481
University of Concepción · CLPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CL

Funding

FONDEF ID14I10370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) bark extract (PBE) with a quebracho (Schinopsis balansae Engl.) extract (QTE) on methane (CH4) production and in vitro rumen fermentation parameters. A forage diet supplemented with PBE or QTE (0, 2 and 4% dry matter (DM) basis) was incubated for 24 h to determine in vitro DM disappearance (IVDMD), CH4, volatile fatty acids (VFA), and ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) production. Differences were analyzed using Tukey’s test, orthogonal contrasts, hierarchical clustering heatmap (HCH), and principal component analysis (PCA). Both extracts (4% DM) decreased butyrate (Bu; p = 0.001), CH4 (p = 0.005), total VFA (p < 0.001), and NH3-N (p = 0.006) production and increased acetate (Ac; p = 0.003) without affecting the partitioning factor (p = 0.095). Propionate (Pr; p = 0.016) was increased, whereas IVDMD (p = 0.041) was decreased with QTE (4% DM). The inclusion of QTE (2% DM) decreased CH4 production (p = 0.005) and the (Ac + Bu)/Pr ratio (p = 0.003), whereas PBE (2% DM) decreased the NH3-N (p = 0.006) and total VFA production (p < 0.001). The HCH and PCA indicate a negative correlation (r = −0.93; p < 0.001) between CH4 production and tannins. In conclusion, PBE shares many of the effects generated by QTE on ruminal fermentation, although the magnitude of these effects depends on concentration. The PBE could be used as an additive in ruminant diets to reduce CH4 and NH3-N production without reducing IVDMD or increasing propionate, but further in vivo studies are required to clarify its effects on animal production.

Indexed as

greenhouse gaseslivestockmitigationpolyphenolruminanttannin

Identifiers

PMID35565507
PMCPMC9100322
OpenAlexW4224241026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.