Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35565452›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Recurrence of Uterine Smooth Muscle Tumor of Uncertain Malignant Potential: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Jacopo Di Giuseppe, Camilla Grelloni, Lucia Giuliani, Giovanni Delli Carpini, Luca Giannella, Andrea Ciavattini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Towards a greater understanding of uterine sarcomas.Case reports in women's health · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jacopo Di GiuseppeWoman's Health Sciences Department, Gynecologic Section, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Filippo Corridoni, 16, 60123 Ancona, Italy.
Camilla GrelloniWoman's Health Sciences Department, Gynecologic Section, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Filippo Corridoni, 16, 60123 Ancona, Italy.
Lucia GiulianiWoman's Health Sciences Department, Gynecologic Section, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Filippo Corridoni, 16, 60123 Ancona, Italy.
Giovanni Delli CarpiniWoman's Health Sciences Department, Gynecologic Section, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Filippo Corridoni, 16, 60123 Ancona, Italy.
Luca GiannellaWoman's Health Sciences Department, Gynecologic Section, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Filippo Corridoni, 16, 60123 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6405-8522
Andrea CiavattiniWoman's Health Sciences Department, Gynecologic Section, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Filippo Corridoni, 16, 60123 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8037-4947

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to systematically review the existing literature on uterine smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) to provide information about characteristics and outcomes of patients and the risk factors for recurrence over a period of 60 years (1960−2021). Methods: According to PRISMA guidelines, we searched for "uterine smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential" in PubMed (all fields) and Scopus (Title/Abstract/Keywords) databases (accessed on 1 January 2022). Relevant articles were obtained in full-text format and screened for additional references. The only filter used was the English language. Studies including full case description of patients with histopathological diagnosis of STUMP in accordance with Stanford criteria were included. Results: Thirty-four studies, including 189 cases, were included. The median age was 43 years, and in 21.5% of cases there was a recurrence of the disease. Bivariate analysis showed a significant association between use of morcellation without bag and risk of recurrence (p = 0.001). Unprotected morcellation during demolitive or conservative surgery was independently associated with a higher risk of disease recurrence with a relative risk of 2.94 (p < 0.001). A significant progressive decrease in the recurrence rate was observed over time (r = −0.671, p = 0.008). The percentage of patients who underwent surgery followed by in-bag protected morcellation significantly increased after the publication of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration alert about the risk linked to this procedure (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Unprotected morcellation of the lesion is associated with the relapse of the disease. However, this clinical condition showed a drastic decrease over time. This could likely be due to the increased awareness by surgeons of the importance of customizing surgical treatment.

Indexed as

fibroid uterusleiomyomaleiomyosarcomasmooth muscle tumoruncertain malignant potentialuterine STUMP

Identifiers

PMID35565452
PMCPMC9104240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.