ArticleCancers2022
Molecular Profiles of Advanced Urological Cancers in the PERMED-01 Precision Medicine Clinical Trial.
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Tumor Boards clinical impact on patient care and structural features: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Next-generation sequencing for guiding matched targeted therapies in people with relapsed or metastatic cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Rapid establishment of KRAS-driven bladder cancer initiation and immune escape models using genetically engineered mice and organoid approaches.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- The plasma nanoDSF denaturation profiles predict the presence of breast cancer.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Real-World Data From a Molecular Tumor Board-Assisted Cancer Care From a Single Center in The Czech Republic: Is Precision Oncology an Accessible Option, or a Privilege for a Minority of Patients?Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- The Growth Modulation Index (GMI) as an Efficacy Outcome in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Scoping Review with Suggested Reporting Guidelines.Current oncology reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe prognosis of advanced urological cancers (AUC) remains unfavorable, and few data are available regarding precision medicine.
methodsthe PERMED-01 prospective clinical trial assessed the impact of molecular profiling in adults with refractory advanced solid cancer, in terms of number of patients with tumor actionable genetic alterations (AGA), feasibility, description of molecular alterations, treatment, and clinical outcome. We present here those results in the 64 patients enrolled with AUC. DNA extracted from a new tumor biopsy was profiled in real-time (targeted NGS, whole-genome array-comparative genomic hybridization), and the results were discussed during a weekly molecular tumor board meeting.
resultsa complete molecular profile was obtained in 49 patients (77%). Thirty-eight (59%) had at least one AGA. Twelve (19%) received a matched therapy on progression, of which 42% had a PFS2/PFS1 ratio ≥ 1.3 versus 5% in the "non-matched therapy group" (
conclusionthe profiling of a newly biopsied tumor sample identified AGA in 59% of patients with AUC, led to "matched therapy" in 19%, and provided clinical benefit in 8%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.