Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35565287›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Companion Diagnostics and Predictive Biomarkers for MET-Targeted Therapy in NSCLC.

Jan Trøst Jørgensen, Jens Mollerup

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Multidrug Resistance: Are We Still Afraid of the Big Bad Wolf.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Plasma ddPCR for the detection ofTherapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. TargetingCancers · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Exploring circular MET RNA as a potential biomarker in tumors exhibiting high MET activity.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2023
    Article
  14. [Biomarker MET in tumor pathology].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jan Trøst JørgensenDepartment: Medical Sciences, Dx-Rx Institute, Baunevaenget 76, 3480 Fredensborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6255-0006
Jens MollerupPathology Division, Agilent Technologies Denmark ApS, Produktionsvej 42, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5455-6061
Agilent Technologies (Denmark) · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysregulation of the MET tyrosine kinase receptor is a known oncogenic driver, and multiple genetic alterations can lead to a clinically relevant oncogenesis. Currently, a number of drugs targeting MET are under development as potential therapeutics for different cancer indications, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, relatively few of these drugs have shown sufficient clinical activity and obtained regulatory approval. One of the reasons for this could be the lack of effective predictive biomarkers to select the right patient populations for treatment. So far, capmatinib is the only MET-targeted drug approved with a companion diagnostic (CDx) assay, which is indicated for the treatment of metastatic NSCLC in patients having a mutation resulting in

Indexed as

amivantamabcapmatinibcrizotinibFISHMETMET amplificationMET exon 14 skipping mutationNGSNSCLCtepotinib

Identifiers

PMID35565287
PMCPMC9105764
OpenAlexW4224997486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.