Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35565273›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

The Patient-Derived Cancer Organoids: Promises and Challenges as Platforms for Cancer Discovery.

JuneSung Bae, Yun Sik Choi, Gunsik Cho, Se Jin Jang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Potential Use of Organoids in Regenerative Medicine.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

JuneSung BaeDepartment of Research and Development, OncoClew Co., Ltd., Seoul 04778, Korea.
Yun Sik ChoiDepartment of Research and Development, OncoClew Co., Ltd., Seoul 04778, Korea.
Gunsik ChoDepartment of Research and Development, OncoClew Co., Ltd., Seoul 04778, Korea.
Se Jin JangDepartment of Research and Development, OncoClew Co., Ltd., Seoul 04778, Korea.
Asan Medical Center · KR

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute HR21C0198National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2019M3E5D3071926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cancer burden is rapidly increasing in most countries, and thus, new anticancer drugs for effective cancer therapy must be developed. Cancer model systems that recapitulate the biological processes of human cancers are one of the cores of the drug development process. PDCO has emerged as a unique model that preserves the genetic, physiological, and histologic characteristics of original cancer, including inter- and intratumoral heterogeneities. Due to these advantages, the PCDO model is increasingly investigated for anticancer drug screening and efficacy testing, preclinical patient stratification, and precision medicine for selecting the most effective anticancer therapy for patients. Here, we review the prospects and limitations of PDCO compared to the conventional cancer models. With advances in culture success rates, co-culture systems with the tumor microenvironment, organoid-on-a-chip technology, and automation technology, PDCO will become the most promising model to develop anticancer drugs and precision medicine.

Indexed as

drug efficacy testpatient-derived cancer organoidprecision medicinerecapitulation of human cancer biology

Identifiers

PMID35565273
PMCPMC9105149
OpenAlexW4224866871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.