Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35565251›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Prognostic Biomarkers for Survival in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Kazi Anisha Islam, Larry Ka-Yue Chow, Ngar Woon Kam, Ying Wang, Chi Leung Chiang, Horace Cheuk-Wai Choi, Yun-Fei Xia, Anne Wing-Mui Lee, Wai Tong Ng, Wei Dai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Epigenomic landscape of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kazi Anisha IslamDepartment of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5457-0648
Larry Ka-Yue ChowDepartment of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Ngar Woon KamDepartment of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Ying WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Chi Leung ChiangDepartment of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9836-6478
Horace Cheuk-Wai ChoiDepartment of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Yun-Fei XiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Anne Wing-Mui LeeDepartment of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Wai Tong NgDepartment of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6696-3000
Wei DaiDepartment of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC) 17103218, 17102619University Grants Committee (UGC) Government Matching Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review aims to identify prognostic molecular biomarkers which demonstrate strong evidence and a low risk of bias in predicting the survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. The literature was searched for on PubMed to identify original clinical studies and meta-analyses which reported associations between molecular biomarkers and survival, including ≥150 patients with a survival analysis, and the results were validated in at least one independent cohort, while meta-analyses must include ≥1000 patients with a survival analysis. Seventeen studies fulfilled these criteria-two studies on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), three studies on methylation biomarkers, two studies on microRNA biomarkers, one study on mutational signature, six studies on gene expression panels, and three meta-analyses on gene expressions. The comparison between the hazard ratios of high-risk and low-risk patients along with a multivariate analysis are used to indicate that these biomarkers have significant independent prognostic values for survival. The biomarkers also indicate a response to certain treatments and whether they could be used as therapeutic targets. This review highlights that patients' genetics, epigenetics, and signatures of cancer and immune cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) play a vital role in determining their survival.

Indexed as

biomarkersnasopharyngeal carcinomaprognosissurvivalsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35565251
PMCPMC9103785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.