Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35565199›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Convolutional Neural Networks to Detect Vestibular Schwannomas on Single MRI Slices: A Feasibility Study.

Carole Koechli, Erwin Vu, Philipp Sager, Lukas Näf, Tim Fischer, Paul M Putora, Felix Ehret, Christoph Fürweger, Christina Schröder, Robert Förster and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Carole KoechliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland.
Erwin VuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3298-517X
Philipp SagerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland.
Lukas NäfDepartment of Radiology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Tim FischerDepartment of Radiology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1807-9146
Paul M PutoraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Felix EhretBerlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6177-1755
Christoph FürwegerEuropean Radiosurgery Center, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Christina SchröderDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4168-2795
Robert FörsterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7664-9207
Daniel R ZwahlenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4359-7735
Alexander MuacevicEuropean Radiosurgery Center, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Paul WindischDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1040-4888

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 195054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study. we aimed to detect vestibular schwannomas (VSs) in individual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) slices by using a 2D-CNN. A pretrained CNN (ResNet-34) was retrained and internally validated using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1c) MRI slices from one institution. In a second step, the model was externally validated using T1c- and T1-weighted (T1) slices from a different institution. As a substitute, bisected slices were used with and without tumors originating from whole transversal slices that contained part of the unilateral VS. The model predictions were assessed based on the categorical accuracy and confusion matrices. A total of 539, 94, and 74 patients were included for training, internal validation, and external T1c validation, respectively. This resulted in an accuracy of 0.949 (95% CI 0.935-0.963) for the internal validation and 0.912 (95% CI 0.866-0.958) for the external T1c validation. We suggest that 2D-CNNs might be a promising alternative to 2.5-/3D-CNNs for certain tasks thanks to the decreased demand for computational power and the fact that there is no need for segmentations. However, further research is needed on the difference between 2D-CNNs and more complex architectures.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningmachine learningneuro-oncologyschwannomavestibular

Identifiers

PMID35565199
PMCPMC9104481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.