Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35565187›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Optical Genome Mapping as a Diagnostic Tool in Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Julia Suttorp, Jonathan Lukas Lühmann, Yvonne Lisa Behrens, Gudrun Göhring, Doris Steinemann, Dirk Reinhardt, Nils von Neuhoff, Markus Schneider

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Optical Genome Mapping as a New Approach to Detecting Cytogenetic Abnormalities: Why Is It Difficult in Multiple Myeloma?Turkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. NovelCancers · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julia SuttorpClinic of Pediatrics III, University Hospital Essen, Virchow-Straße 171, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Jonathan Lukas LühmannDepartment of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9446-2411
Yvonne Lisa BehrensDepartment of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Gudrun GöhringDepartment of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Doris SteinemannDepartment of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Dirk ReinhardtClinic of Pediatrics III, University Hospital Essen, Virchow-Straße 171, 45147 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7027-4483
Nils von NeuhoffClinic of Pediatrics III, University Hospital Essen, Virchow-Straße 171, 45147 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4138-5341
Markus SchneiderClinic of Pediatrics III, University Hospital Essen, Virchow-Straße 171, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Essen University Hospital · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric AML is characterized by numerous genetic aberrations (chromosomal translocations, deletions, insertions) impacting its classification for risk of treatment failure. Aberrations are described by classical cytogenetic procedures (karyotyping, FISH), which harbor limitations (low resolution, need for cell cultivation, cost-intensiveness, experienced staff required). Optical Genome Mapping (OGM) is an emerging chip-based DNA technique combining high resolution (~500 bp) with a relatively short turnaround time. Twenty-four pediatric patients with AML, bi-lineage leukemia, and mixed-phenotype acute leukemia were analyzed by OGM, and the results were compared with cytogenetics. Results were discrepant in 17/24 (70%) cases, including 32 previously unknown alterations called by OGM only. One newly detected deletion and two translocations were validated by primer walking, breakpoint-spanning PCR, and DNA sequencing. As an added benefit, in two cases, OGM identified a new minimal residual disease (MRD) marker. Comparing impact on risk stratification in de novo AML, 19/20 (95%) cases had concordant results while only OGM unraveled another high-risk aberration. Thus, OGM considerably expands the methodological spectrum to optimize the diagnosis of pediatric AML via the identification of new aberrations. Results will contribute to a better understanding of leukemogenesis in pediatric AML. In addition, aberrations identified by OGM may provide markers for MRD monitoring.

Indexed as

acute myeloid leukemiacytogeneticsMRD monitoringoptical genome mappingpediatric

Identifiers

PMID35565187
PMCPMC9102001
OpenAlexW4224253656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.