Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35565146›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Clinical Use of Aligners Associated with Nuvola

Giovanna Perrotti, Alessandro Carrafiello, Ornella Rossi, Lorena Karanxha, Giulia Baccaglione, Massimo Del Fabbro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Retrospective Study Regarding the Efficacy of NuvolaDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Orthodontic aligners: between passion and science.Dental press journal of orthodontics · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giovanna PerrottiLake Como Institute, 22100 Como, Italy.
Alessandro CarrafielloPrivate Practice, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Ornella RossiLake Como Institute, 22100 Como, Italy.
Lorena KaranxhaDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milano, Italy.
Giulia BaccaglionePrivate Practice, 20154 Milano, Italy.
Massimo Del FabbroDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7144-0984
University of Milan · ITAzienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Aligners represent a common treatment for orthodontic patients thanks to their countless advantages including aesthetics, comfort, and oral hygiene maintenance; at the same time, they are associated with a reduced number of visits and a low incidence of complications. Although aligners have undergone considerable improvements over time, to date they have limitations in resolving the most serious malocclusions related to transverse maxillary deficiency. The aim of the present study was to retrospectively evaluate an orthodontic protocol (the Nuvola® OP System) which associates a morpho-functional corrector (to be used for 30 min/day) with the aligner, allowing for the treatment of cases that would be difficult or unpredictable with aligners alone. Methods: Linear measurements were taken on STL files of 100 patients. In 77 patients between 18 and 55 years (mean 28.6 ± 16.2 (standard deviation) years), 3D superimpositions of the maxilla obtained from intraoral scans before and after treatment were performed in order to evaluate the degree of maxillary expansion. The normality of the data distribution was tested. The pre- and post-treatment data were compared using a paired t-test with a 5% significance level. After treatment, a questionnaire was proposed to assess patients’ degree of satisfaction and compliance. Results: A statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) for each distance evaluated was found. The maximum expansion was obtained at the first molar level (2.35 ± 1.64 mm). Of the subjects who completed the questionnaire, 96% were satisfied and 90% were able to perform the protocol without difficulty for the required duration. Conclusions: A significant expansion of the maxillary arch as well as a high degree of patient satisfaction and compliance were observed with the Nuvola® OP System. Further studies are needed in order to clinically evaluate the relative contribution of the aligners and morpho-functional device to the obtained expansion.

Indexed as

MalocclusionPalatal Expansion TechniqueHumansMaxillaRetrospective StudiesTooth Movement Techniquesalignersintraoral scanmaxillary palatal expansionorthodontic treatmentsuperimposition

Identifiers

PMID35565146
PMCPMC9103427
OpenAlexW4229455784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.