Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35565110›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Assessment of Acceptability and Initial Effectiveness of a Unified Protocol Prevention Program to Train Emotional Regulation Skills in Female Nursing Professionals during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Vanesa Ferreres-Galán, María Vicenta Navarro-Haro, Óscar Peris-Baquero, Silvia Guillén-Marín, Jordi de Luna-Hermoso, Jorge Osma

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vanesa Ferreres-GalánMental Health Unit of the Hospital Comarcal of Vinaròs, 12500 Vinaròs, Spain.
María Vicenta Navarro-HaroHealth Research Institute of Aragón, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9726-3250
Óscar Peris-BaqueroHealth Research Institute of Aragón, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2437-1207
Silvia Guillén-MarínDepartment of Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza, 44003 Teruel, Spain.
Jordi de Luna-HermosoMental Health Unit of the Hospital Comarcal of Vinaròs, 12500 Vinaròs, Spain.
Jorge OsmaHealth Research Institute of Aragón, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7293-318X
Universidad de Zaragoza · ESInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare professionals, especially women, have shown increases in anxious-depressive symptoms as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a Unified Protocol (UP) prevention program to provide emotional regulation skills to cope with stressful situations. The sample consisted of 27 nursing professionals (100% women; mean age: 45.67; SD = 7.71) working in a Spanish public hospital during COVID-19, who were randomized to an immediate treatment group (ITG,

Indexed as

COVID-19Emotional RegulationFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPandemicsPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 pandemicemotion regulation skillsnursing professionalspreventionunified protocol

Identifiers

PMID35565110
PMCPMC9101624
OpenAlexW4229334246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.