Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35565036›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

The Moral, Ethical, Personal, and Professional Challenges Faced by Physicians during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Krzysztof Goniewicz, Mariusz Goniewicz, Anna Włoszczak-Szubzda, Dorota Lasota, Frederick M Burkle, Marta Borowska-Stefańska, Szymon Wiśniewski, Amir Khorram-Manesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Krzysztof GoniewiczDepartment of Security, Polish Air Force University, 08-521 Dęblin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4368-6850
Mariusz GoniewiczDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3004-6195
Anna Włoszczak-SzubzdaFaculty of Human Sciences, University of Economics and Innovation, 20-209 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0080-2527
Dorota LasotaDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4359-1544
Frederick M BurkleHarvard Humanitarian Initiative, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5110-7284
Marta Borowska-StefańskaInstitute of the Built Environment and Spatial Policy, University of Lodz, 90-142 Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2448-4778
Szymon WiśniewskiInstitute of the Built Environment and Spatial Policy, University of Lodz, 90-142 Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5488-5949
Amir Khorram-ManeshDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2734-5733

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic, apart from the main problems concerning the health and life of patients, sparked a discussion about physicians' moral and social professional attitudes. During a pandemic, physicians have the same ethical, moral, and medical responsibilities, however, the situation is different since they are self-exposed to a danger, which may influence their willingness to work. The problem of the professional moral attitudes of health care workers, recurring in ethical discussions, prompts us to define the limits of the duties of physicians in the event of a pandemic, hence this research aimed to assess these duties from an ethical perspective and to define their boundaries and scope. The study was conducted in May and June 2020 in the city of Lublin, covering all medical centers, and the questionnaire was completed by 549 physicians. The research was conducted in four areas: emergency standby in the event of a disaster, even if it is not requested; willingness to work overtime in the event of a disaster, even without payment; willingness to take health risks by caring for people who are infectious or exposed to hazardous substances; readiness to be transferred to other departments in the event of a disaster. Although most of the respondents declared to be agreed on personal sacrifices in the performance of professional duties, they were not prepared for a high level of personal risk when working in a pandemic. Excessive workload, its overwhelming nature, and personal risk are not conducive to readiness to work overtime, especially without pay. Research shows how important it is to respect the rights and interests of all parties involved in a pandemic. Physicians' duty to care for a patient is also conditioned by the duty to protect themselves and should not be a tool for intimidating and depersonalizing their social and professional lives.

Indexed as

COVID-19PhysiciansAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansMoralsPandemicsCOVID-19ethicsphysicianprofessional attitude

Identifiers

PMID35565036
PMCPMC9103076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.