Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35564924›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Strategies for the Psychological Support of the Healthcare Workforce during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The ERNST Study.

Adriana López-Pineda, Irene Carrillo, Aurora Mula, Sofia Guerra-Paiva, Reinhard Strametz, Susanna Tella, Kris Vanhaecht, Massimiliano Panella, Bojana Knezevic, Marius-Ionut Ungureanu and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Addressing Mental Health Symptoms Among COVID-19 Healthcare Workers: A Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Pilot Study.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2024
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 11 countries.

Adriana López-PinedaThe Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region, 03550 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2117-0178
Irene CarrilloHealth Psychology Department, Miguel Hernandez University, 03202 Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6981-7284
Aurora MulaThe Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region, 03550 Alicante, Spain.
Sofia Guerra-PaivaPublic Health Research Centre, National School of Public Health, NOVA University of Lisbon, 1600-560 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4311-3799
Reinhard StrametzWiesbaden Business School, RheinMain University of Applied Science, 65183 Wiesbaden and German Coalition for Patient Safety, 10179 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9920-8674
Susanna TellaFaculty of Social Services and Health Care, LAB University of Applied Sciences, 53850 Lappeenranta, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4584-8852
Kris VanhaechtDepartment of Quality, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5636-4792
Massimiliano PanellaDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1880-7198
Bojana KnezevicDepartment for Quality Assurance and Improvement in Healthcare, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-5525-3775
Marius-Ionut UngureanuDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400376 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Einav SruloviciThe Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1291-8284
Sandra C ButtigiegDepartment of Health Systems Management and Leadership, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, Malta.ORCID 0000-0002-0572-2462
Ivana SkoumalováDepartment of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0001-6893-4158
Paulo SousaPublic Health Research Centre, National School of Public Health, NOVA University of Lisbon, 1600-560 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9502-6075
Jose MiraThe Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region, 03550 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6497-083X
On Behalf Of The Ernst Consortium Collaborators
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ESUniversity of Lisbon · PTBabeș-Bolyai University · ROFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana · ESKU Leuven · BELAB University of Applied Sciences · FIRheinMain University of Applied Sciences · DEUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb · HRUniversity of Haifa · ILUniversity of Malta · MTUniversity of Pavol Jozef Šafárik · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic led to the implementation of interventions to provide emotional and psychological support to healthcare workers in many countries. This ecological study aims to describe the strategies implemented in different countries to support healthcare professionals during the outbreak. Data were collected through an online survey about the measures to address the impact of the pandemic on the mental health of healthcare workers. Healthcare professionals, researchers, and academics were invited to respond to the survey. Fifty-six professionals from 35 countries contributed data to this study. Ten countries (28.6%) reported that they did not launch any national interventions. Both developed and developing countries launched similar initiatives. There was no relationship between the existence of any type of initiative in a country with the incidence, lethality, and mortality rates of the country due to COVID-19, and per capita income in 2020. The 24 h hotline for psychological support was the most frequent intervention. Tools for self-rescue by using apps or websites were extensively used, too. Other common interventions were the development of action protocols, availability of regular and updated information, implantation of distance learning systems, early detection of infection programs for professionals, economic reinforcements, hiring of staff reinforcement, and modification of leave and vacation dates.

Indexed as

COVID-19Delivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansPandemicsWorkforceCOVID-19government programshealth personnelmental healthsocial support

Identifiers

PMID35564924
PMCPMC9105489
OpenAlexW4225274861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.