Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35564859›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

The Psychological Experience of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Impact on the Willingness to Receive Booster Vaccines among the Chinese Population: Evidence from a National Cross-Sectional Study.

Yudong Miao, Yi Li, Wanliang Zhang, Jian Wu, Jianqin Gu, Meiyun Wang, Wei Wei, Beizhu Ye, Chengyuan Miao, Clifford Silver Tarimo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yudong MiaoDepartment of Health Management, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Yi LiDepartment of Health Management, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Wanliang ZhangDepartment of Health Management, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Jian WuDepartment of Health Management, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Jianqin GuResearch Center for Lifestyle Medicine, School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Meiyun WangDepartment of Hypertension, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450003, China.
Wei WeiDepartment of Hypertension, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450003, China.
Beizhu YeDepartment of Health Management, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Chengyuan MiaoDepartment of Health Management, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Clifford Silver TarimoDepartment of Health Management, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0672-9471
Wenyong DongDepartment of Hypertension, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450003, China.
Zhengzhou University · CNSouthern University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the psychological experience of COVID-19 basic vaccination, the willingness to receive booster vaccines, and to determine their relationships among Chinese people. Between 6 August 2021 and 9 August 2021, a research firm performed a national cross-sectional online survey among Chinese individuals (aged over 18), using the snowball sampling approach, with 26,755 participants. Factor analysis and binary logistic regression were used to evaluate the existing associations. The overall COVID-19 vaccination psychological experience score of the participants was 25.83 (25.78~25.89; scores ranged from 7-35). A total of 93.83% (95%CI = 93.54~94.12) of respondents indicated a willingness to receive booster vaccines. After classifying psychological experiences associated with COVID-19 vaccination into positive and negative experiences and adjusting for confounding factors, for the former, the willingness to receive booster vaccines for participants with the highest scores of 13-15 was 3.933 times higher (OR = 3.933, 95%CI = 3.176~4.871) than participants who obtained scores of 3-9, and for the latter, the willingness to receive booster vaccines for participants with the highest scores of 19-20 was 8.871 times higher (OR = 8.871, 95%CI = 6.240~12.612) than participants who obtained scores of 4-13. Our study suggests that a good psychological experience with vaccination is positively associated with an increased willingness to receive booster vaccines.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAgedChinaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccinesbooster vaccinesCOVID-19COVID-19 vaccinationpsychological experiencewillingness

Identifiers

PMID35564859
PMCPMC9100074
OpenAlexW4225130514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.