ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022
Social Media User Behavior and Emotions during Crisis Events.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Location based bursty event detection and information dissemination using influencers in Twitter.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Affective homophily as the dominant organizing principle in online conflict discourse networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Harnessing deep learning to monitor people's perceptions towards climate change on social media.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- How politics affect pandemic forecasting: spatio-temporal early warning capabilities of different geo-social media topics in the context of state-level political leaning.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Using online negative emotions to predict risk-coping behaviors in the relocation of Beijing municipal government.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Wildfires and social media discourse: exploring mental health and emotional wellbeing through Twitter.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Sentiment Impact of Public Health Agency communication Strategies on TikTok under COVID-19 Normalization: Deep Learning Exploration.Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health · 2023Article
- Extracting Useful Emergency Information from Social Media: A Method Integrating Machine Learning and Rule-Based Classification.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Publicity governance in contingency management during the COVID-19 pandemic in China: A "Government-Society" perspective.PloS one · 2023Article
- Social media use for coping with stress and psychological adjustment: A transactional model of stress and coping perspective.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The wide availability of smart mobile devices and Web 2.0 services has allowed people to easily access news, spread information, and express their opinions and emotions using various social media platforms. However, because of the ease of joining these sites, people also use them to spread rumors and vent their emotions, with the social platforms often playing a facilitation role. This paper collected more than 190,000 messages published on the Chinese Sina-Weibo platform to examine social media user behaviors and emotions during an emergency, with a particular research focus on the "Dr. Li Wenliang" reports associated with the COVID-19 epidemic in China. The verified accounts were found to have the strongest interactions with users, and the sentiment analysis revealed that the news from government agencies had a positive user effect and the national media and trusted experts were more favored by users in an emergency. This research provides a new perspective on trust and the use of social media platforms in crises, and therefore offers some guidance to government agencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.