Scrutinizing the Impact of Alternating Electromagnetic Fields on Molecular Features of the Model Plant

Sonja Michèle Schmidtpott, Saliba Danho, Vijay Kumar, Thorsten Seidel, Wolfgang Schöllhorn, Karl-Josef Dietz

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sonja Michèle SchmidtpottDepartment of Biochemistry and Physiology of Plants, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9386-7516

Saliba DanhoDepartment of Training and Movement Science, Mainz University, 55122 Mainz, Germany.

Vijay KumarDepartment of Biochemistry and Physiology of Plants, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7771-4269

Thorsten SeidelDepartment of Biochemistry and Physiology of Plants, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4423-3001

Wolfgang SchöllhornDepartment of Training and Movement Science, Mainz University, 55122 Mainz, Germany.

Karl-Josef DietzDepartment of Biochemistry and Physiology of Plants, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0311-2182

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural and anthropogenic electromagnetic fields (EMFs) are ubiquitous in the environment and interfere with all biological organisms including plants. Particularly the quality and quantity of alternating EMFs from anthropogenic sources are increasing due to the implementation of novel technologies. There is a significant interest in exploring the impact of EMFs (similar to those emitted from battery chargers of electric cars) on plants. The model plant

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsAcclimatizationElectromagnetic FieldsLightPhotosynthesisArabidopsis Proteinsabiotic stress acclimationArabidopsis thalianaelectromagnetic fieldsmetabolitesphotosynthesistranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID35564539

DOI10.3390/ijerph19095144

PMCPMC9099453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.