ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022
Molecular Diagnostic Tools Applied for Assessing Microbial Water Quality.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progress of Rapid Detection Technology for Aquatic Microorganisms: A Comprehensive Review.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Comparative Evaluation of Electrochemical and Fluorescent Readouts for Immunomagnetically Captured Waterborne Pathogens Using a Biochip with Bifunctional Magnetic Nanoparticles.ACS measurement science au · 2026Article
- Genotypic and phenotypic strategies to detect antibiotic resistance in foodborne pathogens along the food processing chain.Current research in food science · 2026Review
- Quantitative Estimation of Low-Abundance Targets in Engineered Systems and Environmental Samples: Comparative Study Between Droplet Digital PCR and Real-Time PCR.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Viruses in Wastewater-A Concern for Public Health and the Environment.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- FlashPCR: Revolutionising qPCR by Accelerating Amplification through Low ∆T Protocols.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Evaluation of a Tetracycline-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Waterborne pathogens detection technologies: advances, challenges, and future perspectives.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbial water quality is of vital importance for human, animal, and environmental health. Notably, pathogenically contaminated water can result in serious health problems, such as waterborne outbreaks, which have caused huge economic and social losses. In this context, the prompt detection of microbial contamination becomes essential to enable early warning and timely reaction with proper interventions. Recently, molecular diagnostics have been increasingly employed for the rapid and robust assessment of microbial water quality implicated by various microbial pollutants, e.g., waterborne pathogens and antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs), imposing the most critical health threats to humans and the environment. Continuous technological advances have led to constant improvements and expansions of molecular methods, such as conventional end-point PCR, DNA microarray, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), multiplex qPCR (mqPCR), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), digital droplet PCR (ddPCR), and high-throughput next-generation DNA sequencing (HT-NGS). These state-of-the-art molecular approaches largely facilitate the surveillance of microbial water quality in diverse aquatic systems and wastewater. This review provides an up-to-date overview of the advancement of the key molecular tools frequently employed for microbial water quality assessment, with future perspectives on their applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.