Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35564467›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Anthropometric Equations to Determine Maximum Height in Adults ≥ 60 Years: A Systematic Review.

Arnulfo Ramos-Jiménez, Rosa P Hernández-Torres, Isaac A Chávez-Guevara, José A Alvarez-Sanchez, Marco A García-Villalvazo, Miguel Murguía-Romero

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Arnulfo Ramos-JiménezDepartamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Ciudad Juárez 32310, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4347-6725
Rosa P Hernández-TorresFacultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Ciudad Juárez 32310, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-1772-5836
Isaac A Chávez-GuevaraDepartamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Ciudad Juárez 32310, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9773-5043
José A Alvarez-SanchezFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca 50000, Mexico.
Marco A García-VillalvazoLicenciatura en Medicina, Instituto Universitario de Ciencias Médicas y Humanisticas de Tepic Nayarit, Tepic 63190, Mexico.
Miguel Murguía-RomeroInstituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.
Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez · MXAutonomous University of Chihuahua · MXInstituto Universitario de Ciencias Médicas y Humanísticas de Nayarit · MXUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de México · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although it is common to measure bone lengths for study, methodological errors in data measurement and processing often invalidate their clinical and scientific usefulness. This manuscript reviews the validity of several published equations used to determine the maximum height in older adults, since height is an anthropometric parameter widely employed in health sciences. A systematic review of original articles published in the English, Spanish, or Portuguese languages was performed in PubMed, ScienceDirect, EBSCO, Springer Link, and two institutional publisher integrators (UACJ and CONRICYT). The search terms were included in the metasearch engines in a combined way and text form using the Boolean connectors AND and OR {(Determination OR Estimation OR Equation) AND Height AND (Elderly OR "Older adults")}. Eleven manuscripts were selected from 1935 records identified through database searching after applying the following criteria: (1) original articles that designed and validated equations for the determination of height by anthropometric methods in adults 60 years of age and older and (2) manuscripts that presented robust evidence of validation of the proposed regression models. The validity of the reported linear regression models was assessed throughout a manuscript review process called multi-objective optimization that considered the collection of the models, the prediction errors, and the adjustment values (i.e., R

Indexed as

Body HeightAgedAnthropometryEthnicityFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle Agedbone lengthepigeneticgeneticgeriatricregression models

Identifiers

PMID35564467
PMCPMC9101954
OpenAlexW4224283900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.