Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35564414›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Analysis of Factors Influencing Polish Students' Opinions on Euthanasia.

Iga Stokłosa, Maciej Stokłosa, Gniewko Więckiewicz, Mateusz Porwolik, Maciej Bugajski, Wilhelm Masarczyk, Tomasz Męcik-Kronenberg, Magdalena Piegza, Robert Pudlo, Piotr Gorczyca

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Iga StokłosaDepartment and Clinic of Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia, 42-612 Tarnowskie Gory, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7283-5491
Maciej StokłosaDepartment and Clinic of Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia, 42-612 Tarnowskie Gory, Poland.
Gniewko WięckiewiczDepartment and Clinic of Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia, 42-612 Tarnowskie Gory, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2404-393X
Mateusz PorwolikDepartment of Ophtalmology, Medical University of Silesia, 40-514 Katowice, Poland.
Maciej BugajskiNational Research Institute of Oncology, State Research Institute, 31-115 Krakow, Poland.
Wilhelm MasarczykDepartment and Clinic of Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia, 42-612 Tarnowskie Gory, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9516-0709
Tomasz Męcik-KronenbergDepartment of Pathomorphology, Medical Univeristy of Silesia, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland.
Magdalena PiegzaDepartment and Clinic of Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia, 42-612 Tarnowskie Gory, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8009-7118
Robert PudloDepartment and Clinic of Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia, 42-612 Tarnowskie Gory, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5748-0063
Piotr GorczycaDepartment and Clinic of Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia, 42-612 Tarnowskie Gory, Poland.
Medical University of Silesia · PLKrakow Cardiovascular Research Institute · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the continuous development of palliative care and methods of pain relief in the last moments of patients’ lives, we are faced with the question of how long we should take measures to delay inevitable death for, without providing prolonged therapy against the patient’s will. For terminally ill and people experiencing unimaginable suffering, euthanasia is considered as one of the possible options for a dignified farewell. The aim of the study was to determine the views on euthanasia in a group of students from Polish universities. Questionnaire responses were analyzed for 9686 students (79.9% of women and 20.1% of men) aged 18−35 years. Respondents were asked to complete their own questionnaire on demographic data and attitudes toward euthanasia in the case of severe terminal illness or paralysis preventing independent living. Euthanasia was significantly more acceptable among women (85% vs. 75%, p < 0.0001; 69% vs. 62%, p < 0.0001) and non-believers [98% vs. 97% (denominations other than Christian), 84% (other forms of Christianity), 69% (Roman Catholic); p < 0.0001] in every case considered. Religious affiliation was the factor that most influenced attitudes toward euthanasia. Among the other elements influencing attitudes toward euthanasia, residence and field of study were distinguished. Considering the large sample size and specific conclusions, the article should be an important argument in the discussion on euthanasia.

Indexed as

EuthanasiaStudents, MedicalAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansMalePalliative CarePolandSurveys and Questionnairesdeathethicseuthanasiapublic healthstudents

Identifiers

PMID35564414
PMCPMC9099665
OpenAlexW4224281661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.