Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35564342›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Exploring Risk Factors of Recall-Associated Foodborne Disease Outbreaks in the United States, 2009-2019.

Emily Sanchez, Ryan B Simpson, Yutong Zhang, Lauren E Sallade, Elena N Naumova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A messaging standard for environmental inspections: is it time?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily SanchezFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8999-5822
Ryan B SimpsonFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1375-5387
Yutong ZhangFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Lauren E SalladeFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Elena N NaumovaFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9562-4734

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Earlier identification and removal of contaminated food products is crucial in reducing economic burdens of foodborne outbreaks. Recalls are a safety measure that is deployed to prevent foodborne illnesses. However, few studies have examined temporal trends in recalls or compared risk factors between non-recall and recall outbreaks in the United States, due to disparate and often incomplete surveillance records in publicly reported data. We demonstrated the usability of the electronic Foodborne Outbreak Reporting System (eFORS) and National Outbreak Reporting System (NORS) for describing temporal trends and outbreak risk factors of food recalls in 1998−2019. We examined monthly trends between surveillance systems by using segmented time-series analyses. We compared the risk factors (e.g., multistate outbreak, contamination supply chain stage, pathogen etiology, and food products) of recalls and non-recalls by using logistic regression models. Out of 22,972 outbreaks, 305 (1.3%) resulted in recalls and 9378 (41%) had missing recall information. However, outbreaks with missing recall information decreased at an accelerating rate of ~25%/month in 2004−2009 and at a decelerating rate of ~13%/month after the transition from eFORS to NORS in 2009−2019. Irrespective of the contaminant etiology, multistate outbreaks according to the residence of ill persons had odds 11.00−13.50 times (7.00, 21.60) that of single-state outbreaks resulting in a recall (p < 0.001) when controlling for all risk factors. Electronic reporting has improved the availability of food recall data, yet retrospective investigations of historical records are needed. The investigation of recalls enhances public health professionals’ understanding of their annual financial burden and improves outbreak prediction analytics to reduce the likelihood and severity of recalls.

Indexed as

Foodborne DiseasesDisease OutbreaksHumansMental RecallPopulation SurveillanceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsUnited Statesdata credibilityfoodborne outbreaksfood recallsNational Outbreak Reporting System (NORS)

Identifiers

PMID35564342
PMCPMC9099668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.