Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35564328›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Validation of Psychometric Properties of the Nursing Work Index-Revised Scale in Portugal.

Sara Anunciada, Patrícia Benito, Filomena Gaspar, Pedro Lucas

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Analyzing and Validating a Structure for Measuring the Nurse Practice Environment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sara AnunciadaNursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Nursing School of Lisbon, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1600-096 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6062-4961
Patrícia BenitoBarreiro Montijo Hospital Centre, 2830-003 Barreiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6415-3730
Filomena GasparNursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Nursing School of Lisbon, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1600-096 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8139-2717
Pedro LucasNursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Nursing School of Lisbon, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1600-096 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2560-7306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of instruments designed to assess the nursing practice environment is crucial to improve the quality of nursing care, to anticipate problems and difficulties that may arise in organizations, and allow nurse managers to implement changes and improvements in key areas. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Nursing Work Index-Revised Portuguese version (NWI-R-PT) scale. A quantitative, observational, descriptive, and cross-sectional study was conducted.

methodsThe sample consisted of 767 nurses from 4 public Portuguese hospitals. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis techniques were used to test the distinct structural models. The scale's accuracy was evaluated through internal consistency, using Cronbach's alpha.

resultsNWI-R-PT internal consistency was 0.91. The NWI-R-PT model with six factors, namely "Management Support," "Professional Development," "Fundamentals of Nursing," "Nurse-Physician Relationship," "Endowments," and "Organization of Nursing Care," was supported by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The NWI-R-PT scale presents adequate goodness-of-fit indices concerning the final factorial model and the convergent validity.

conclusionsThe NWI-R-PT scale has a competent and reliable structure. The scale's validity is confirmed; therefore, it may be employed in all contexts in clinical practice, research, and nursing management. The NWI-R-PT is a useful and valid instrument to assess the nursing environment in hospitals, primary care, long-term care, and nursing homes. The scale has significance in improving the quality of nursing care and patient safety, the professional development of nurses, and organizational results.

Indexed as

PsychometricsCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansPortugalReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesevidence-based practicehealth facility environmenthospitalsinstrument developmentnursingpractice managementpsychometricsquality of carevalidation studieswork environment

Identifiers

PMID35564328
PMCPMC9102481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.