Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35563932›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Purchasing Habits, Sustainability Perceptions, and Welfare Concerns of Italian Consumers Regarding Rabbit Meat.

Stefania Crovato, Anna Pinto, Guido Di Martino, Giulia Mascarello, Valentina Rizzoli, Silvia Marcolin, Licia Ravarotto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effects of a Diet ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefania CrovatoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7081-0648
Anna PintoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6715-1327
Guido Di MartinoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1290-3154
Giulia MascarelloIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7588-6227
Valentina RizzoliDepartment of Communication and Social Research, Sapienza University of Rome, 00198 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6240-4519
Silvia MarcolinIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1277-9341
Licia RavarottoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

Ministero della Salute IZSVe RC16/17; ID: B23C17000190001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several factors drive consumer behavior in buying meat, particularly rabbit meat. The consumption of rabbits has decreased in Europe, and the main causes of this trend are an increasing association with the perception of rabbits as pets, consumers' changes in lifestyle, and eating habits. Additionally, increasing attention is paid to ethical issues regarding animal welfare. Investigating consumers' knowledge, perceptions, and concerns about rabbit meat production and consumption are crucial for improving market strategies. This study investigated consumers' perspectives of rabbit meat to provide useful information to producers for promoting this sector to consumers. A mixed-methods research design was applied. Qualitative data were collected through four focus group discussions involving 32 consumers and quantitative data through a semi-structured questionnaire administered nationally and completed by 1001 consumers. The limited use of antibiotics in inbreeding and the absence of animal suffering are factors that most influence consumers' willingness to purchase rabbit meat. Rural/domestic farms were recognized as places where animal welfare measures can be applied and have a positive influence not only on organoleptic quality but also on ethical value and food safety. The cage was perceived as unsuitable for rabbit growth and was oriented to a process of fattening based on industrial feed and antibiotics. Respondents sought information on rabbit farming during purchase, and the label was the most used tool. The rabbit meat production sector should consider these results to meet consumers' demands and raise awareness among operators on the use of animal welfare-based farming systems, helping to build a more positive image of the rabbit meat industry.

Indexed as

animal welfareconsumer perceptionsItalian consumerspurchasing habits

Identifiers

PMID35563932
PMCPMC9105318
OpenAlexW4224230792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.