Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35563888›Full record

ArticleCells2022

Electrospun Membrane Surface Modification by Sonocoating with HA and ZnO:Ag Nanoparticles-Characterization and Evaluation of Osteoblasts and Bacterial Cell Behavior In Vitro.

Julia Higuchi, Katarzyna Klimek, Jacek Wojnarowicz, Agnieszka Opalińska, Agnieszka Chodara, Urszula Szałaj, Sylwia Dąbrowska, Damian Fudala, Grazyna Ginalska

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julia HiguchiLaboratory of Nanostructures, Institute of High Pressure Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 01-142 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9528-5982
Katarzyna KlimekChair and Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4236-9087
Jacek WojnarowiczLaboratory of Nanostructures, Institute of High Pressure Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 01-142 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6106-5188
Agnieszka OpalińskaLaboratory of Nanostructures, Institute of High Pressure Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 01-142 Warsaw, Poland.
Agnieszka ChodaraLaboratory of Nanostructures, Institute of High Pressure Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 01-142 Warsaw, Poland.
Urszula SzałajLaboratory of Nanostructures, Institute of High Pressure Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 01-142 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2304-1481
Sylwia DąbrowskaLaboratory of Nanostructures, Institute of High Pressure Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 01-142 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0175-4635
Damian FudalaLaboratory of Nanostructures, Institute of High Pressure Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 01-142 Warsaw, Poland.
Grazyna GinalskaChair and Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9961-4226
Institute of High Pressure Physics · PLMedical University of Lublin · PLWarsaw University of Technology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guided tissue regeneration and guided bone regeneration membranes are some of the most common products used for bone regeneration in periodontal dentistry. The main disadvantage of commercially available membranes is their lack of bone cell stimulation and easy bacterial colonization. The aim of this work was to design and fabricate a new membrane construct composed of electrospun poly (D,L-lactic acid)/poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) fibers sonocoated with layers of nanoparticles with specific properties, i.e., hydroxyapatite and bimetallic nanocomposite of zinc oxide-silver. Thus, within this study, four different variants of biomaterials were evaluated, namely: poly (D,L-lactic acid)/poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) biomaterial, poly(D,L-lactic acid)/poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid)/nano hydroxyapatite biomaterial, poly (D,L-lactic acid)/poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid)/nano zinc oxide-silver biomaterial, and poly (D,L-lactic acid)/poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid)/nano hydroxyapatite/nano zinc oxide-silver biomaterial. First, it was demonstrated that the wettability of biomaterials-a prerequisite property important for ensuring desired biological response-was highly increased after the sonocoating process. Moreover, it was indicated that biomaterials composed of poly (D,L-lactic acid)/poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) with or without a nano hydroxyapatite layer allowed proper osteoblast growth and proliferation, but did not have antibacterial properties. Addition of a nano zinc oxide-silver layer to the biomaterial inhibited growth of bacterial cells around the membrane, but at the same time induced very high cytotoxicity towards osteoblasts. Most importantly, enrichment of this biomaterial with a supplementary underlayer of nano hydroxyapatite allowed for the preservation of antibacterial properties and also a decrease in the cytotoxicity towards bone cells, associated with the presence of a nano zinc oxide-silver layer. Thus, the final structure of the composite poly (D,L-lactic acid)/poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid)/nano hydroxyapatite/nano zinc oxide-silver seems to be a promising construct for tissue engineering products, especially guided tissue regeneration/guided bone regeneration membranes. Nevertheless, additional research is needed in order to improve the developed construct, which will simultaneously protect the biomaterial from bacterial colonization and enhance the bone regeneration properties.

Indexed as

Metal NanoparticlesZinc OxideAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiocompatible MaterialsDurapatiteOsteoblastsPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerSilverAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiocompatible MaterialsDurapatitePolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerSilverZinc Oxidebimetallic nanocompositesbone regenerationcellular responseselectrospinningnanohydroxyapatiteregenerative medicinesonocoating

Identifiers

PMID35563888
PMCPMC9103553
OpenAlexW4229332090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.