Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35563832›Full record

ArticleCells2022

Comparison of Whole Blood Cryopreservation Methods for Extensive Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping.

Valentina Serra, Valeria Orrù, Sandra Lai, Monia Lobina, Maristella Steri, Francesco Cucca, Edoardo Fiorillo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. SiteCELL enablesiScience · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Valentina SerraInstitute for Genetic and Biomedical Research, National Research Council (CNR), Cittadella Universitaria di Monserrato, 09042 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5782-8752
Valeria OrrùInstitute for Genetic and Biomedical Research, National Research Council (CNR), Cittadella Universitaria di Monserrato, 09042 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6047-4625
Sandra LaiInstitute for Genetic and Biomedical Research, National Research Council (CNR), Cittadella Universitaria di Monserrato, 09042 Cagliari, Italy.
Monia LobinaInstitute for Genetic and Biomedical Research, National Research Council (CNR), Cittadella Universitaria di Monserrato, 09042 Cagliari, Italy.
Maristella SteriInstitute for Genetic and Biomedical Research, National Research Council (CNR), Cittadella Universitaria di Monserrato, 09042 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5869-3872
Francesco CuccaInstitute for Genetic and Biomedical Research, National Research Council (CNR), Cittadella Universitaria di Monserrato, 09042 Cagliari, Italy.
Edoardo FiorilloInstitute for Genetic and Biomedical Research, National Research Council (CNR), Cittadella Universitaria di Monserrato, 09042 Cagliari, Italy.
Institute of Genetic and Biomedical Research · ITUniversity of Sassari · IT

Funding

NIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201600005CNIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201600005I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fresh blood immunophenotyping by flow cytometry, based on the reliable simultaneous detection of several markers in a cell, is the method of choice to study the circulating human immune system. Especially in large and multicenter studies, high sample quality is difficult to achieve, and adequate collection and storage of samples with fine-tuned whole blood cryopreservation is mandatory. Here, we compared the quality of immunophenotypic data obtained from fresh blood with those obtained after five cryopreservation methods by quantifying the levels of 41 immune cell populations. They comprised B and T lymphocyte subsets and their maturation stages, as well as monocytes and granulocytes. Three methods used fixative solutions and two other methods used dimethyl sulfoxide solutions to preserve cell viability. The fixative methods prevented detection of markers critical for identification of B and T cell subsets, including CD27, CXCR3, and CCR6. The other two methods permitted reliable discrimination of most immune-cell populations in thawed samples, though some cell frequencies varied compared to the corresponding fresh sample. Of those two methods, the one preserving blood in media containing dimethyl sulfoxide produced results that were most similar to those with fresh samples.

Indexed as

CryopreservationDimethyl SulfoxideFixativesFlow CytometryHumansImmunophenotypingDimethyl SulfoxideFixativescryopreservationflow cytometryimmunophenotypingmethod comparisonwhole blood

Identifiers

PMID35563832
PMCPMC9103885
OpenAlexW4225319500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.