Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35563817›Full record

ArticleCells2022

Effects of One-Day Application of Levodopa/Carbidopa/Entacapone versus Levodopa/Carbidopa/Opicapone in Parkinson's Disease Patients.

Thomas Müller, Eugen Schlegel, Stephanie Zingler, Hans Michael Thiede

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of Opicapone on Levodopa Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Fluctuating Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2022
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Parkinson's disease and vitamins: a focus on vitamin B12.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Therapeutic drug monitoring in Parkinson's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Objective assessment of the effects of opicapone in Parkinson's disease through kinematic analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas MüllerDepartment of Neurology, St. Joseph Hospital Berlin-Weissensee, Gartenstr. 1, 13088 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6799-0753
Eugen SchlegelDepartment of Neurology, Kreisklinikum Siegen, Weidenauer Str. 76, 57076 Siegen, Germany.
Stephanie ZinglerSwiss Pharm Audit GmbH, Rösliweg 11, 8404 Winterthur, Switzerland.
Hans Michael ThiedeThanares GmbH, Hermannswerder 14, 14473 Potsdam, Germany.
St. Joseph-Krankenhaus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors entacapone and opicapone prolong the efficacy of conventional oral levodopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor formulations through an increase in levodopa plasma bioavailability. Catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors influence the homocysteine metabolism associated with levodopa/dopa decarboxylase application. The objectives of this study were to compare the impact of additional single-day entacapone or opicapone intake on the pharmacokinetic plasma behaviour of levodopa, 3-O-methyldopa and total homocysteine in 15 Parkinson's disease patients, with concomitant scoring of motor symptoms, under standardized conditions. The patients received opicapone plus two doses of 100 mg levodopa/carbidopa and, one week later, two doses of levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone or vice versa. Levodopa, 3-O-methyldopa and total homocysteine were determined with reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Levodopa bioavailability and its maximum concentration were higher with opicapone. The computed peak-to-trough difference was lower after the second levodopa administration with entacapone. The fluctuation index of levodopa did not differ between both conditions. 3-O-methyldopa decreased on both days. Homocysteine levels did not significantly vary between both conditions. A significant homocysteine decrease occurred with entacapone, but not with opicapone. Motor behaviour improved with entacapone, but not with opicapone. Opicapone baseline scores were significantly better, and thus the potential for the improvement in motor symptoms was lower compared with the entacapone condition. The higher levodopa bioavailability with opicapone suggests that it is more efficacious than entacapone for the amelioration of "off" phenomena in fluctuating patients when co-administered with a levodopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor regimen. Both compounds prevented an increase in homocysteine, which is a metabolic marker for an impaired capacity in the performance of methylation processes.

Indexed as

CarbidopaParkinson DiseaseAntiparkinson AgentsAromatic Amino Acid Decarboxylase InhibitorsCatechol O-MethyltransferaseCatechol O-Methyltransferase InhibitorsCatecholsHomocysteineHumansLevodopaNitrilesOxadiazolesAntiparkinson AgentsAromatic Amino Acid Decarboxylase InhibitorsCarbidopaCatechol O-MethyltransferaseCatechol O-Methyltransferase InhibitorsCatecholsentacaponeHomocysteineLevodopaNitrilesopicaponeOxadiazoles3-O-methyldopaentacaponehomocysteinelevodopaopicaponeParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID35563817
PMCPMC9105632
OpenAlexW4225247991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.